Kidney international reports · 2022
Estimating Extracellular Fluid Volume in Healthy Individuals: Evaluation of Existing Formulae and Development of a New Equation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Faucon Anne-Laure, Flamant Martin, Delanaye Pierre, Lambert Oriane, Essig Marie, Peraldi Marie-Noëlle, Tabibzadeh Nahid, Haymann Jean-Philippe, Stengel Bénédicte, Geri Guillaume, Vidal-Petiot Emmanuelle
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Several clinical settings require an accurate estimation of the physiologically expected extracellular fluid volume (ECFV). We aimed to analyze the performances of existing ECFV-estimating equations and to develop a new equation.
METHODS: The performances of 11 ECFV-estimating equations were analyzed in 228 healthy kidney donor candidates (Bichat Hospital, Paris, France) who underwent ECFV measurement using the distribution volume of 51Cr-labeled EDTA (51Cr-EDTA). An equation was developed using a penalized linear modeling approach (elastic net regression) and externally (Tenon Hospital, Paris, France, N = 142) validated.
RESULTS: Participants from Bichat (mean age 45.2 ± 12.0 years, 43.0% men) and Tenon (47.8 ± 10.3 years, 29.6% men) hospitals had a mean measured ECFV of 15.4 ± 2.8 l and 15.1 ± 2.1 l, respectively. Available ECFV-estimating formulae have highly variable precision and accuracy. The new equation incorporating body weight, height, sex, and age had better precision and accuracy than all other equations in the external validation cohort, with a median bias of -0.20 (95% CI: -0.35 to -0.05) l versus -2.63 (-2.87 to -2.42) l to -0.57 (- 0.83 to -0.40) l and 0.21 (0.12 to 0.43) l to 2.89 (2.65 to 3.11) l, for underestimating and overestimating equations, respectively, an interquartile range for the bias of 0.88 (0.70 to 1.08) l versus 0.91 (0.71 to 1.20) l to 1.93 (1.67 to 2.25) l, and an accuracy within 10% of 90.9% (83.8 to 94.4) versus 88.0% (81.0 to 92.3) to 8.5% (4.2 to 13.4). These results were consistent across subgroups defined by sex, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), age, and ethnicity.
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a new equation to estimate the individual reference value of ECFV, which is easily usable in clinical practice. Further validation in cohorts including individuals of extreme age and corpulence remains needed.
METHODS: The performances of 11 ECFV-estimating equations were analyzed in 228 healthy kidney donor candidates (Bichat Hospital, Paris, France) who underwent ECFV measurement using the distribution volume of 51Cr-labeled EDTA (51Cr-EDTA). An equation was developed using a penalized linear modeling approach (elastic net regression) and externally (Tenon Hospital, Paris, France, N = 142) validated.
RESULTS: Participants from Bichat (mean age 45.2 ± 12.0 years, 43.0% men) and Tenon (47.8 ± 10.3 years, 29.6% men) hospitals had a mean measured ECFV of 15.4 ± 2.8 l and 15.1 ± 2.1 l, respectively. Available ECFV-estimating formulae have highly variable precision and accuracy. The new equation incorporating body weight, height, sex, and age had better precision and accuracy than all other equations in the external validation cohort, with a median bias of -0.20 (95% CI: -0.35 to -0.05) l versus -2.63 (-2.87 to -2.42) l to -0.57 (- 0.83 to -0.40) l and 0.21 (0.12 to 0.43) l to 2.89 (2.65 to 3.11) l, for underestimating and overestimating equations, respectively, an interquartile range for the bias of 0.88 (0.70 to 1.08) l versus 0.91 (0.71 to 1.20) l to 1.93 (1.67 to 2.25) l, and an accuracy within 10% of 90.9% (83.8 to 94.4) versus 88.0% (81.0 to 92.3) to 8.5% (4.2 to 13.4). These results were consistent across subgroups defined by sex, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), age, and ethnicity.
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a new equation to estimate the individual reference value of ECFV, which is easily usable in clinical practice. Further validation in cohorts including individuals of extreme age and corpulence remains needed.