Transplantation · 2020
Performance of Creatinine Clearance and Estimated GFR in Assessing Kidney Function in Living Donor Candidates.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garg Neetika, Snyder Grace, Li Jianbo, Mandelbrot Didier, Poggio Emilio D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is a key aspect in the evaluation of living kidney donor candidates; however, data on performance of commonly used methods are limited.
METHODS: We examined 769 living kidney donor candidates with 24-hour urine collections assessed as accurate by comparing measured creatinine excretion rate (CER) to CER estimated using a 4-variable equation previously developed and validated using robust methodology.
RESULTS: Of all collections, 42.6% would have been deemed inaccurate, mostly under-collections, using the conventional weight- and gender-based CER estimation. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) overestimated I-iothalamate GFR (iGFR), estimated GFR (eGFR), underestimated iGFR, and their average [Avg (CrCl and eGFR)] essentially eliminated the GFR bias (median bias = +2.2, -5.4, and -1.0 mL/min/1.73 m, respectively; P < 0.001). This held true for all subgroups except blacks, where all 3 measures overestimated iGFR. Avg (CrCl and eGFR) also offered modestly improved accuracy compared with CrCl alone, as measured by the proportion of values falling within 10% (50.7% versus 45.3%; P = 0.009) and 30% of iGFR (94.5% versus 89.3%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: When measured GFR is unavailable, the Avg (CrCl and eGFR) provides a better estimate of kidney function in kidney donor candidates than either measure alone, although in blacks the estimates are neither better nor worse.
METHODS: We examined 769 living kidney donor candidates with 24-hour urine collections assessed as accurate by comparing measured creatinine excretion rate (CER) to CER estimated using a 4-variable equation previously developed and validated using robust methodology.
RESULTS: Of all collections, 42.6% would have been deemed inaccurate, mostly under-collections, using the conventional weight- and gender-based CER estimation. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) overestimated I-iothalamate GFR (iGFR), estimated GFR (eGFR), underestimated iGFR, and their average [Avg (CrCl and eGFR)] essentially eliminated the GFR bias (median bias = +2.2, -5.4, and -1.0 mL/min/1.73 m, respectively; P < 0.001). This held true for all subgroups except blacks, where all 3 measures overestimated iGFR. Avg (CrCl and eGFR) also offered modestly improved accuracy compared with CrCl alone, as measured by the proportion of values falling within 10% (50.7% versus 45.3%; P = 0.009) and 30% of iGFR (94.5% versus 89.3%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: When measured GFR is unavailable, the Avg (CrCl and eGFR) provides a better estimate of kidney function in kidney donor candidates than either measure alone, although in blacks the estimates are neither better nor worse.