Transplantation · 2015
Perspectives of Transplant Professionals on the Values, Ethics, and Challenges of Living Kidney Donor Evaluation in Asia.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tong Allison, Chapman Jeremy R, Kee Terence, Li Philip K T, Tsai Daniel F C, Wong Germaine, Craig Jonathan C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Deceased donor rates in Asia are among the lowest in the world. This has necessitated a reliance on living kidney donation, which has given rise to concerns about donor motivation and assessment in this region. We aimed to describe transplant professional perspectives on living kidney donor evaluation in Asia.
METHODS: Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 53 transplant professionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], coordinators [n = 7], social workers [n = 5], ethicists [n = 2], psychologist [n = 1]) from 20 centers in 10 countries. Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify themes.
RESULTS: The theme of traversing vulnerability overarched 4 themes. Vigilance against exploitation of the vulnerable meant mitigating the threat of commercial transplantation, combating disparities, and verifying volunteerism. Maintaining clarity of professional roles encompassed the perceived necessity of legal safeguards to determine legitimacy of relationships, ensuring informed consent, demarcating responsibilities, minimizing conflict of interest, meeting community expectations, and resolving ambivalence regarding donor risk. Societal plight driving caution about living kidney donor assessment was emphasized in the context of poverty and desperation, higher risk of disease, and lack of social security. Navigating sociocultural barriers acknowledged the centrality of the family, economic priorities, distrust in modern medicine, generational traditions, and emotional opacity limiting their ability to gauge donor motivation.
CONCLUSIONS: Moral, professional, sociocultural and societal vulnerabilities contribute to the barriers and ethical quandaries in living kidney donation in Asia. Strategies are needed to address culturally based anxieties and disparities in living donation. Transplant professionals depend on strong legislation and policies to prevent exploitation of living donors.
METHODS: Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 53 transplant professionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], coordinators [n = 7], social workers [n = 5], ethicists [n = 2], psychologist [n = 1]) from 20 centers in 10 countries. Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify themes.
RESULTS: The theme of traversing vulnerability overarched 4 themes. Vigilance against exploitation of the vulnerable meant mitigating the threat of commercial transplantation, combating disparities, and verifying volunteerism. Maintaining clarity of professional roles encompassed the perceived necessity of legal safeguards to determine legitimacy of relationships, ensuring informed consent, demarcating responsibilities, minimizing conflict of interest, meeting community expectations, and resolving ambivalence regarding donor risk. Societal plight driving caution about living kidney donor assessment was emphasized in the context of poverty and desperation, higher risk of disease, and lack of social security. Navigating sociocultural barriers acknowledged the centrality of the family, economic priorities, distrust in modern medicine, generational traditions, and emotional opacity limiting their ability to gauge donor motivation.
CONCLUSIONS: Moral, professional, sociocultural and societal vulnerabilities contribute to the barriers and ethical quandaries in living kidney donation in Asia. Strategies are needed to address culturally based anxieties and disparities in living donation. Transplant professionals depend on strong legislation and policies to prevent exploitation of living donors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAsiaAttitude of Health PersonnelCultural CharacteristicsDonor SelectionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPerceptionProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSocial ResponsibilitySocioeconomic FactorsVolitionVulnerable PopulationsYoung Adult