MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7182/pit2014757

Медицинская библиотека · Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2014

Independent donor ethical assessment: aiming to standardize donor advocacy.

Choudhury Devasmita, Jotterand Fabrice, Casenave Gerald, Smith-Morris Carolyn, University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Donor Advocacy Team

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Living organ donation has become more common across the world. To ensure an informed consent process, given the complex issues involved with organ donation, independent donor advocacy is required. The choice of how donor advocacy is administered is left up to each transplant center. This article presents the experience and process of donor advocacy at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center administered by a multidisciplinary team consisting of physicians, surgeons, psychologists, medical ethicists and anthropologists, lawyers, a chaplain, a living kidney donor, and a kidney transplant recipient. To ensure that advocacy remains fair and consistent for all donors being considered, the donor advocacy team at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center developed the Independent Donor Ethical Assessment, a tool that may be useful to others in rendering donor advocacy. In addition, the tool may be modified as circumstances arise to improve donor advocacy and maintain uniformity in decision making.

Для цитирования: Choudhury Devasmita, Jotterand Fabrice, Casenave Gerald, Smith-Morris Carolyn, University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Donor Advocacy Team. Independent donor ethical assessment: aiming to standardize donor advocacy.. Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.). 2014. DOI: 10.7182/pit2014757.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.