Transplantation proceedings · 2006
Is male homosexuality still a cultural taboo for kidney donation?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piccoli G B, Soragna G, Putaggio S, Consiglio V, Magnano A, Mezza E, Bonetto A, Geuna S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Among the so-called social risk behaviors, male homosexuality is probably one of the most interesting and difficult taboos. Because of changing attitudes of the general population toward irregular sexual behaviors, often considered as markers of unhealthy life styles, there is a need to reconsider at least the most important one-homosexuality.
METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire included opinions on homosexuality with respect to kidney donation: Would you consider a male homosexual as a kidney donor? If you were on dialysis, would you accept a kidney from a homosexual donor? This instrument was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (Liceo Classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; Istituto Tecnico: n=108, median age 17); first and fourth year of medical school (n=77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (n=44, age 32); third year of nursing school (n=31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (n=51, age 63).
RESULTS: Male homosexuality was well accepted for kidney donation (71.6% yes, 9.6% no, 18.8% uncertain/blank). However, the opinions were different among the groups with male students of a technical institute showing discrimination against male homosexuals. In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, gender, and belonging to the health care team. In the multivariate analysis, the latter was the strongest predictor (P<.01). The specific threats for the health are not well known, even among the caregiver population.
CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define the role of homosexuality among the so-called social risk behaviors. Negative attitudes existed in some subsets of the population.
METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire included opinions on homosexuality with respect to kidney donation: Would you consider a male homosexual as a kidney donor? If you were on dialysis, would you accept a kidney from a homosexual donor? This instrument was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (Liceo Classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; Istituto Tecnico: n=108, median age 17); first and fourth year of medical school (n=77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (n=44, age 32); third year of nursing school (n=31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (n=51, age 63).
RESULTS: Male homosexuality was well accepted for kidney donation (71.6% yes, 9.6% no, 18.8% uncertain/blank). However, the opinions were different among the groups with male students of a technical institute showing discrimination against male homosexuals. In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, gender, and belonging to the health care team. In the multivariate analysis, the latter was the strongest predictor (P<.01). The specific threats for the health are not well known, even among the caregiver population.
CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define the role of homosexuality among the so-called social risk behaviors. Negative attitudes existed in some subsets of the population.