MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.02.003

Медицинская библиотека · Transplantation proceedings · 2004

Living donor transplant: wider selection criteria.

Splendiani G, Cipriani S, Valeri M, Torlone N, Vega A, Tullio T, Condò S, Dominijanni S, Casciani C U

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The availability of cadaveric donor organs is insufficient for actual needs. The organ demand increases by 20% per year. Living donor transplant (LDT) may be a valid therapeutical alternative provided one uses proper criteria. LDT provides many advantages, like improved patient and organ survival, short waiting time, and the possibility to carefully plan the procedure. Potential risks include perioperative mortality and renal dysfunction in the kidney donor. At present, kidney LDTs in Italy represent 8% of the total, with an organ survival rate of 97% after 1 year (vs 93% for cadaveric transplants) and donors mortality rate of almost null. Most LDTs are performed from kinsmen. Presently, law no. 458, 26 June 1967, is in force in Italy for kidney LDT and law no. 453, 16 December 1999, for liver LDT. The foundations of LDT are, of course, the recipient's condition, the donor's motivation, and the altruism of the donation. It is desirable that in the future an increasing number of LDT be performed, supported by a careful, widespread health education regarding organ donation from living subjects and by the possibility to obtain insurance for the donor, which has been considered but never provided by actual laws.

Для цитирования: Splendiani G, Cipriani S, Valeri M, Torlone N, Vega A, Tullio T, Condò S, Dominijanni S, Casciani C U. Living donor transplant: wider selection criteria.. Transplantation proceedings. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.02.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.