Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021
Change in hepatic volume profile in potential live liver donors after lifestyle modification for reduction of hepatic steatosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Hyo Jung, Kim Kyoung Won, Lee Jeongjin, Park Taeyong, Kwon Heon-Ju, Song Gi-Won, Lee Sung-Gyu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate changes in hepatic volume and hemiliver volume percentage in potential liver donors after hepatic steatosis (HS) reduction through lifestyle modification.
METHODS: Fifty liver donor candidates with HS (macrovesicular fat [MaF] ≥ 20%) underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) and liver biopsy before (baseline) and after (follow-up) lifestyle modification. According to the change in MaF, subjects were classified as group A (MaF reduction ≥ 20%, n = 25), and group B (MaF reduction < 20%, n = 25). The hepatic volume and hemiliver volume percentage were measured using CT volumetric analysis.
RESULTS: Volume percentage of the left hemiliver + S1 (over the whole liver) significantly increased at follow-up in group A (P < 0.001) but not in group B (P = 0.598). The absolute volume change of the right hemiliver and its percentage change from the baseline were significantly greater than those of the left hemiliver + S1 in group A (P < 0.007). There were no significant differences in these values in group B (P = 0.064 and 0.507, respectively). The percentage of subjects that earned the benefit of becoming suitable donors from the change in hepatic volume distribution caused by HS improvement was 52.0% (13/25) and 40.0% (10/25) in group A and group B, respectively. Regarding posthepatectomy liver failure, none was identified in group A after donation, whereas 12% (3/25) was identified in group B.
CONCLUSION: Hepatic volume profile may change considerably in potential liver donors with HS (MaF ≥ 20%) after HS reduction through lifestyle modification. Reevaluation of the hepatic volume is required before liver procurement after lifestyle modification in these subjects.
METHODS: Fifty liver donor candidates with HS (macrovesicular fat [MaF] ≥ 20%) underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) and liver biopsy before (baseline) and after (follow-up) lifestyle modification. According to the change in MaF, subjects were classified as group A (MaF reduction ≥ 20%, n = 25), and group B (MaF reduction < 20%, n = 25). The hepatic volume and hemiliver volume percentage were measured using CT volumetric analysis.
RESULTS: Volume percentage of the left hemiliver + S1 (over the whole liver) significantly increased at follow-up in group A (P < 0.001) but not in group B (P = 0.598). The absolute volume change of the right hemiliver and its percentage change from the baseline were significantly greater than those of the left hemiliver + S1 in group A (P < 0.007). There were no significant differences in these values in group B (P = 0.064 and 0.507, respectively). The percentage of subjects that earned the benefit of becoming suitable donors from the change in hepatic volume distribution caused by HS improvement was 52.0% (13/25) and 40.0% (10/25) in group A and group B, respectively. Regarding posthepatectomy liver failure, none was identified in group A after donation, whereas 12% (3/25) was identified in group B.
CONCLUSION: Hepatic volume profile may change considerably in potential liver donors with HS (MaF ≥ 20%) after HS reduction through lifestyle modification. Reevaluation of the hepatic volume is required before liver procurement after lifestyle modification in these subjects.