MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100049

Медицинская библиотека · JHLT open · 2023

Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation in recipients of hepatitis c virus-infected donor hearts.

Laws J Lukas, Palmer Benjamin, Soslow Jonathan H, Hennessy Cassandra, Gupta Richa, Lindenfeld JoAnn, Dendy Jeffrey M, Liu Dandan, Schlendorf Kelly H, Clark Daniel E, Hughes Sean G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) organ donors offer a viable strategy for expansion of the heart donor pool without an increased risk of recipient mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an effective tool for graft surveillance in heart transplant (HT) recipients. However, there are no data comparing CMR findings in HT recipients based on donor HCV status. The aim of this propensity score matched case-control study was to evaluate baseline CMR characteristics of HCV+ HT recipients and HCV- HT recipients, as well as compare cardiac allograft structure, function, performance, and tissue characterization between groups. CMR normative values did not differ between groups in matched analysis. There were no significant differences in CMR-derived biventricular function, strain, late gadolinium enhancement, or myocardial tissue characteristics by parametric mapping. This study suggests CMR can be a valuable tool for surveillance in HCV+ HT patients, and abnormalities on imaging should not be attributed to HCV infection.

Для цитирования: Laws J Lukas, Palmer Benjamin, Soslow Jonathan H, Hennessy Cassandra, Gupta Richa, Lindenfeld JoAnn, Dendy Jeffrey M, Liu Dandan, Schlendorf Kelly H, Clark Daniel E, Hughes Sean G. Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation in recipients of hepatitis c virus-infected donor hearts.. JHLT open. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100049.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.