The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2016
Impact of cardiac arrest resuscitated donors on heart transplant recipients' outcome.
СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Galeone Antonella, Varnous Shaida, Lebreton Guillaume, Barreda Eleodoro, Hariri Sara, Pavie Alain, Leprince Pascal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of cardiac arrest-resuscitated donors (CARDs) on the outcome of heart recipients.
METHODS: Patients transplanted between July 2004 and December 2012 were divided into 2 groups according to the history of cardiac arrest in donors and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 584 heart transplantations were performed during the study period, and 117 recipients received an organ from a CARD. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to recipient age, sex, cardiomyopathy, preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, national high emergency waiting list, and redo surgery. Donors who sustained a cardiac arrest were significantly younger (44 [32-51] vs 49 [41-56] years; P < .001), their main cause of death was anoxia (57% vs 1%; P < .001), and they had significantly greater troponin T peak levels (0.51 [0.128-3.108] vs 0.11 [0.04-0.43] ng/mL; P < .001). Median cardiac arrest duration was 15 minutes (5-25). No difference was noted in donors with regards to left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement (62% ± 8% vs 63% ± 8%; P = .2). There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to ischemic time (179 ± 60 vs 183 ± 59 minutes; P = .43), need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft failure (31% vs 30%; P = .993) and 30-days mortality. Recipients receiving an organ from a CARD had a significantly better 10 year survival (69.4% vs 50.4%; P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: History of cardiac arrest in donors with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement doesn't affect outcome of heart recipients.
METHODS: Patients transplanted between July 2004 and December 2012 were divided into 2 groups according to the history of cardiac arrest in donors and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 584 heart transplantations were performed during the study period, and 117 recipients received an organ from a CARD. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to recipient age, sex, cardiomyopathy, preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, national high emergency waiting list, and redo surgery. Donors who sustained a cardiac arrest were significantly younger (44 [32-51] vs 49 [41-56] years; P < .001), their main cause of death was anoxia (57% vs 1%; P < .001), and they had significantly greater troponin T peak levels (0.51 [0.128-3.108] vs 0.11 [0.04-0.43] ng/mL; P < .001). Median cardiac arrest duration was 15 minutes (5-25). No difference was noted in donors with regards to left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement (62% ± 8% vs 63% ± 8%; P = .2). There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to ischemic time (179 ± 60 vs 183 ± 59 minutes; P = .43), need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft failure (31% vs 30%; P = .993) and 30-days mortality. Recipients receiving an organ from a CARD had a significantly better 10 year survival (69.4% vs 50.4%; P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: History of cardiac arrest in donors with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement doesn't affect outcome of heart recipients.