Transplantation proceedings · 2014
Low incidence of coronary angiography in the evaluation process of the potential heart donor.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schweiger M, Klüber J, Bosch A, von Levinski D, Prenner G, Stiegler P, Sereinigg M, Tscheliessnigg K-H, Iberer F, Wasler A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the practice of coronary angiography (CA) on donor hearts.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, all reported organ donors aged <66 years were analyzed retrospectively. Donor charts were evaluated regarding a performed CA, its outcome, the timing of CA during the evaluation process, and reasons for organ refusal. The percentage of positive CA studies in organ donors aged ≥45 years was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 292 reported organ donors, 152 organ donor hearts were declined (group 1), and 140 hearts (group 2) were transplanted. Of the 152 declined hearts, 91 hearts were found not suitable for organ offer, and 61 were not successfully allocated or were refused by Eurotransplant. CA was conducted in 17 organ donors (5.8%). In 6 donors, a previous CA was reported (all had pathologic findings), and in 11 donors, a donor CA was performed, indicating 4 pathologic and 7 negative findings (54.5% of the hearts evaluated by donor CA were transplanted). No complication or delay of the donation process was reportedly related to donor CA.
CONCLUSIONS: Special emphasis and implementation of recommendations for CA to be part of the evaluation of donor organs seem necessary.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, all reported organ donors aged <66 years were analyzed retrospectively. Donor charts were evaluated regarding a performed CA, its outcome, the timing of CA during the evaluation process, and reasons for organ refusal. The percentage of positive CA studies in organ donors aged ≥45 years was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 292 reported organ donors, 152 organ donor hearts were declined (group 1), and 140 hearts (group 2) were transplanted. Of the 152 declined hearts, 91 hearts were found not suitable for organ offer, and 61 were not successfully allocated or were refused by Eurotransplant. CA was conducted in 17 organ donors (5.8%). In 6 donors, a previous CA was reported (all had pathologic findings), and in 11 donors, a donor CA was performed, indicating 4 pathologic and 7 negative findings (54.5% of the hearts evaluated by donor CA were transplanted). No complication or delay of the donation process was reportedly related to donor CA.
CONCLUSIONS: Special emphasis and implementation of recommendations for CA to be part of the evaluation of donor organs seem necessary.