Transplantation proceedings · 2020
Effectiveness and Safety of Continuous Transverse Abdominal Plane Blocks vs Epidural Analgesia in Donor Nephroureterectomy.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calixto-Flores Arnulfo, Díaz-Angúlo Wladimir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block is sensitive and encompasses peripheral nerves of the anterior abdominal wall. It decreases 27% of the forced vital capacity, 58% of maximum inspiratory, and 51% of the maximum expiratory pressure on the first postoperative day. It is a postoperative analgesic alternative.
OBJECTIVE: The researchers sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the TAP block compared with continuous epidural analgesia in donor nephroureterectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A controlled clinical trial of 30 randomized patients in 2 groups-TAP and continuous epidural analgesia-was used. In the TAP group, a catheter was installed in the transverse abdominal plane and ropivacaine, 0.375% 20 mL, and ropivacaine, 0.2%, were deposited in an elastomeric infuser. The other group was installed with an epidural catheter; at the end of the surgery, 10mL of ropivacaine 0.2% was administered and connected to an elastomeric infuser. Adverse effects and pain intensity were evaluated in the first 36 hours; Student t test and the χ2 test were applied.
RESULTS: The study showed similar analgesia in both groups at 6 hours after the procedure (P = .256); better analgesia was seen in the TAP group in the next 30 hours (P = .000). Researchers also found time for bladder catheter removal, ambulation, and minor hospital discharge in the TAP vs the epidural group as follows: 18.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.7 ± 4.4 hours (P = .028), 20 ± 3.5 vs 23.5 ± 4.2 hours (P = .019), and 51.2 ± 8.4 vs 62.4 ± 17.6 hours (P = .035), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous TAP blockade is an effective and safe technique. It favors early recovery, early removal of the bladder catheter, ambulation, and discharge.
OBJECTIVE: The researchers sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the TAP block compared with continuous epidural analgesia in donor nephroureterectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A controlled clinical trial of 30 randomized patients in 2 groups-TAP and continuous epidural analgesia-was used. In the TAP group, a catheter was installed in the transverse abdominal plane and ropivacaine, 0.375% 20 mL, and ropivacaine, 0.2%, were deposited in an elastomeric infuser. The other group was installed with an epidural catheter; at the end of the surgery, 10mL of ropivacaine 0.2% was administered and connected to an elastomeric infuser. Adverse effects and pain intensity were evaluated in the first 36 hours; Student t test and the χ2 test were applied.
RESULTS: The study showed similar analgesia in both groups at 6 hours after the procedure (P = .256); better analgesia was seen in the TAP group in the next 30 hours (P = .000). Researchers also found time for bladder catheter removal, ambulation, and minor hospital discharge in the TAP vs the epidural group as follows: 18.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.7 ± 4.4 hours (P = .028), 20 ± 3.5 vs 23.5 ± 4.2 hours (P = .019), and 51.2 ± 8.4 vs 62.4 ± 17.6 hours (P = .035), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous TAP blockade is an effective and safe technique. It favors early recovery, early removal of the bladder catheter, ambulation, and discharge.