DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.04.020
Ex Vivo Reperfusion Model to Evaluate Utility of Machine Preservation for Porcine Liver Donated After Cardiac Death.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Machine perfusion (MP) techniques are expected to prove useful for preserving the organ viability and recovering organ function for organ transplantation. Furthermore, an accurate assessment of organ viability using MP is important for expanding the donor criteria. In this study, an ex vivo reperfusion model (ERM) simulating transplantation using diluted autologous blood under normothermic conditions was evaluated for its utility of MP under subnormothermic conditions for livers donated after cardiac death (DCD).
METHODS
The liver preservation methods for DCD porcine livers were evaluated using the ERM. This investigation was performed using a novel perfusion system developed by our research group. Porcine livers were procured with a warm ischemia time (WIT) of 60 minutes. The organs were then preserved using subnormothemic machine perfusion (SNMP) or static cold storage (CS) for 4 hours. We also compared these tissues with SNMP livers procured under a WIT of 0 minutes. After the preservation, the livers were reperfused for 2 hours using the ERM with diluted autologous blood oxygenated by a membrane oxygenator under NMP conditions. Reperfusion was evaluated based on perfusion flow dynamics and outflow of deviating enzymes.
RESULTS
In the early stages of reperfusion, pressure in the blood vessels increased sharply in the CS group. Furthermore, the amount of aspartate aminotransferase accumulation was lower in the SNMP group than in the other groups. These results suggest ischemia-reperfusion injury is suppressed in SNMP conditions.
CONCLUSION
An ERM has use in evaluating the utility of MP for the DCD liver.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.