DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.039
Midterm Results of Renal Transplantation From Controlled Cardiac Death Donors Are Similar to Those From Brain Death Donors.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The systematic use of grafts from controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD) started in our country in 2012 and expanded with the strategic support of National Transplant Organization. We present our experience in kidney transplantation with organs from cDCD donors with a mean follow-up of 3 years.
METHODS
Observational prospective study of all transplants performed in our center in 2012-2013 followed to 2016. The immunosuppression protocols were triple therapy for low-risk recipients from a standard brain death donor (DBD), adding basiliximab or thymoglobulin induction for extended-criteria donor or high-risk recipient, respectively, and thymoglobulin induction plus triple therapy for all cDCD recipients.
RESULTS
A total of 42 donors were included (84 grafts in total, but 1 discarded due to multiple cysts); 25 DBD and 17 cDCD without differences in age or sex. The graft use rate was 98.9% for cDCD; 55 grafts were implanted in our hospital (26 DBD and 29 cDCD), and the remaining 28 grafts were transferred to other centers. There were no differences in primary failure (3.4% cDCD vs 7.4% DBD), but the cDCD organs had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (51.7% vs 25.9%). Despite that, graft and patient survivals, as well as glomerular filtration rate (66.3 vs 59.6 mL/min) were similar in both groups. Only 1 patient died at home with a functioning graft in the cDCD group.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a higher rate of delayed graft function with cDCD, the midterm outcomes are at least similar to those with DBD. The cDCD programs should be promoted to increase the chances of a transplant in our patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.