Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2015
Is It Safe to Re-Harvest the Anterior Iliac Crest to Manage Le Fort I Interpositional Defects in Young Adults With a Repaired Cleft?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Posnick Jeffrey C, Gray James A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Re-harvesting the anterior iliac crest to obtain autogenous bone grafts is a controversial practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and associated disability of re-harvesting the anterior iliac crest.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: To address the research purpose, the authors executed a retrospective case series study. The sample consisted of young adult patients with cleft (<26 yr old) with prior harvesting of the anterior iliac crest during mixed dentition for management of an alveolar cleft(s) and then re-harvesting of the same donor site for management of interpositional defects after Le Fort I advancement. Wound-healing parameters were reviewed at the donor and recipient sites. A survey questionnaire was provided after completion of treatment to document patient perception of early and any long-term donor-site disability. Descriptive statistics were computed for the variables.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 27 patients with a mean age at re-harvesting of 17 years (range, 14 to 25 yr). Patients underwent on average 7.4-mm horizontal advancement, 2.4-mm lengthening, and 2.6-mm transverse expansion of the maxilla. Adequate bone graft was re-harvested to accomplish objectives in all cases. There were no perioperative complications at the donor or recipient sites. Twenty-six of the 27 patients (97%) had fewer donor-site recovery difficulties at the time of re-harvesting compared with the first time graft was taken. There were no cases of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury and no long-term discomfort with walking, running, or other activities.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the safety and efficacy of re-harvesting corticocancellous bone from the anterior iliac crest for management of interpositional defects associated with Le Fort I advancement in young adults with a repaired cleft.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: To address the research purpose, the authors executed a retrospective case series study. The sample consisted of young adult patients with cleft (<26 yr old) with prior harvesting of the anterior iliac crest during mixed dentition for management of an alveolar cleft(s) and then re-harvesting of the same donor site for management of interpositional defects after Le Fort I advancement. Wound-healing parameters were reviewed at the donor and recipient sites. A survey questionnaire was provided after completion of treatment to document patient perception of early and any long-term donor-site disability. Descriptive statistics were computed for the variables.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 27 patients with a mean age at re-harvesting of 17 years (range, 14 to 25 yr). Patients underwent on average 7.4-mm horizontal advancement, 2.4-mm lengthening, and 2.6-mm transverse expansion of the maxilla. Adequate bone graft was re-harvested to accomplish objectives in all cases. There were no perioperative complications at the donor or recipient sites. Twenty-six of the 27 patients (97%) had fewer donor-site recovery difficulties at the time of re-harvesting compared with the first time graft was taken. There were no cases of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury and no long-term discomfort with walking, running, or other activities.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the safety and efficacy of re-harvesting corticocancellous bone from the anterior iliac crest for management of interpositional defects associated with Le Fort I advancement in young adults with a repaired cleft.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAlveolar Bone GraftingAttitude to HealthAutograftsBone Marrow TransplantationBone TransplantationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIliumMaleMaxillaOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresOsteotomy, Le FortPatient SatisfactionPeriosteumRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRunningSafetyTissue and Organ HarvestingTransplant Donor SiteWalkingWound HealingYoung Adult