Urology · 2014
Simplified method to measure renal volume: the best correction factor for the ellipsoid formula volume calculation in pretransplant computed tomographic live donor.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zakhari Nader, Blew Brian, Shabana Wael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To find an optimal correction factor that will produce a near-real renal volume calculation using the ellipsoid formula.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 79 multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations for potential renal donor assessment. The renal volumes were calculated using the slice summation method, the ellipsoid formula with π/6 as correction factors as well multiple other correction factors for statistical analysis. A paired Student t test was used for evaluating the volumes calculated with different correction factors and the volumes calculated by the slice summation method.
RESULTS: The ellipsoid formula using correction factor 0.524 underestimates the renal volume by approximately 22.2% with statistical difference compared with the slice summation method (P<.05). There is no statistical difference when using correction factor in the range of 0.664 to 0.686 (P>.05). Further subgroup analysis of gender and laterality was performed and revealed no statistical difference. Using a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor results in renal volumes that are 100% and 99.5%.
CONCLUSION: To avoid underestimation of the renal volume by the ellipsoid method, acceptable correction factors are in the range of 0.664 to 0.686. We suggest the use of a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor when using the ellipsoid formula.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 79 multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations for potential renal donor assessment. The renal volumes were calculated using the slice summation method, the ellipsoid formula with π/6 as correction factors as well multiple other correction factors for statistical analysis. A paired Student t test was used for evaluating the volumes calculated with different correction factors and the volumes calculated by the slice summation method.
RESULTS: The ellipsoid formula using correction factor 0.524 underestimates the renal volume by approximately 22.2% with statistical difference compared with the slice summation method (P<.05). There is no statistical difference when using correction factor in the range of 0.664 to 0.686 (P>.05). Further subgroup analysis of gender and laterality was performed and revealed no statistical difference. Using a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor results in renal volumes that are 100% and 99.5%.
CONCLUSION: To avoid underestimation of the renal volume by the ellipsoid method, acceptable correction factors are in the range of 0.664 to 0.686. We suggest the use of a mean value of 0.674 or 0.67 as correction factor when using the ellipsoid formula.