Cornea · 2014
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation: navigating challenges and improving efficiency.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tenkman Lawrence R, Price Francis W, Price Marianne O
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the challenges in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor preparations and provide new strategies to achieve success.
METHODS: A series of 263 consecutive DMEK preparation attempts by a novice surgeon during a corneal fellowship are described. In all cases, the Descemet membrane (DM) and the endothelium were peeled off from the donor cornea while it was submerged in corneal storage medium.
RESULTS: The success rate of preparing DMEK tissue was 99%. Three donor preparations of 263 (1.1%) could not be completed successfully because spots of strong adherence between the DM and the stroma caused multiple horseshoe-shaped tears (HST) to form in the DM. Lamellar splitting of the DM ("partial thickness HST") preceded the formation of most HSTs. At least 1 HST occurred in 13% of donor preparations. In donor pairs (right and left corneas of 1 individual donor), if 1 cornea had any HSTs, there was a 60% chance that the contralateral cornea would have at least 1 HST. If 1 cornea had multiple HSTs, there was an 80% chance that the contralateral cornea would have at least 1 HST. Noting this trend, 3 donor corneas were returned to the eye bank unopened for other uses after their mates had multiple HSTs.
CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate techniques, DMEK donor preparation can be highly successful, even for a novice surgeon. When a donor develops multiple HSTs, we recommend not using the mate for DMEK because of a higher risk of encountering a preparation difficulty.
METHODS: A series of 263 consecutive DMEK preparation attempts by a novice surgeon during a corneal fellowship are described. In all cases, the Descemet membrane (DM) and the endothelium were peeled off from the donor cornea while it was submerged in corneal storage medium.
RESULTS: The success rate of preparing DMEK tissue was 99%. Three donor preparations of 263 (1.1%) could not be completed successfully because spots of strong adherence between the DM and the stroma caused multiple horseshoe-shaped tears (HST) to form in the DM. Lamellar splitting of the DM ("partial thickness HST") preceded the formation of most HSTs. At least 1 HST occurred in 13% of donor preparations. In donor pairs (right and left corneas of 1 individual donor), if 1 cornea had any HSTs, there was a 60% chance that the contralateral cornea would have at least 1 HST. If 1 cornea had multiple HSTs, there was an 80% chance that the contralateral cornea would have at least 1 HST. Noting this trend, 3 donor corneas were returned to the eye bank unopened for other uses after their mates had multiple HSTs.
CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate techniques, DMEK donor preparation can be highly successful, even for a novice surgeon. When a donor develops multiple HSTs, we recommend not using the mate for DMEK because of a higher risk of encountering a preparation difficulty.