Dialogues in health · 2026
Participatory accessibility audits as a tool for disability-inclusive health systems: Findings from two Indian states.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Raghuram Harikeerthan, Verma Shilpee, Lavalekar Eesha, Virk Anoushka, Bhan Anant, Singh Satendra
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Persons with disabilities face a higher need for healthcare but face challenges accessing healthcare. Despite policy developments in India, progress towards accessibility of healthcare facilities for persons with disabilities has been slow.
METHODS: This study used a participatory accessibility audit approach conducted in partnership with the government authorities to evaluate disability accessibility of 35 government hospitals in the states of Madhya Pradesh and Goa in India. A checklist was developed using reference guidelines and consultations with a community advisory board. After piloting, audits were conducted by persons with disabilities recruited as field investigators with training and support provided.
RESULTS: The audits showed that while hospitals have made efforts towards physical accessibility such as through ramps, many of them were inappropriate. There were large gaps in terms of accessibility for persons with sensory impairments. After the audits, the findings were shared at the state and district levels by the auditors and research team, and action plans were co-created with government officials. Early signs of change are being seen in certain districts.
CONCLUSION: While the study shows mixed progress towards ensuring accessibility in government hospitals, it demonstrates a model of participatory accessibility audits. Participatory audits provide a rigorous, rights-based, and scalable model for accountability and change. They have widespread transferability for improving accessibility for disability communities in diverse sectors as well as for improving access to healthcare for diverse marginalised communities. However, ensuring success of the model depends on trusted partnerships between government, disabled people's organisations, health providers and researchers.
METHODS: This study used a participatory accessibility audit approach conducted in partnership with the government authorities to evaluate disability accessibility of 35 government hospitals in the states of Madhya Pradesh and Goa in India. A checklist was developed using reference guidelines and consultations with a community advisory board. After piloting, audits were conducted by persons with disabilities recruited as field investigators with training and support provided.
RESULTS: The audits showed that while hospitals have made efforts towards physical accessibility such as through ramps, many of them were inappropriate. There were large gaps in terms of accessibility for persons with sensory impairments. After the audits, the findings were shared at the state and district levels by the auditors and research team, and action plans were co-created with government officials. Early signs of change are being seen in certain districts.
CONCLUSION: While the study shows mixed progress towards ensuring accessibility in government hospitals, it demonstrates a model of participatory accessibility audits. Participatory audits provide a rigorous, rights-based, and scalable model for accountability and change. They have widespread transferability for improving accessibility for disability communities in diverse sectors as well as for improving access to healthcare for diverse marginalised communities. However, ensuring success of the model depends on trusted partnerships between government, disabled people's organisations, health providers and researchers.