MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0034-89101993000400002

Медицинская библиотека · Revista de saude publica · 1993

[Comparative study of larval and ovitrap efficacy for surveillance of dengue and yellow fever vectors].

Marques C C, Marques G R, de Brito M, dos Santos Neto L G, Ishibashi V de C, Gomes F de A

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A comparative study of the efficiency of ovitraps and larval-traps was undertaken with a view to improving the entomological survey of vectors of Dengue and Yellow Fever-Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus-in S. Paulo State, Brazil. The region studied is infected only by Aedes albopictus, a species that keeps to wild habitats but colonizes artificial breeding grounds as well. The first part of the study was located in a periurban area of Tremembé county were 3 hollon trees, 23 ovitraps and 5 larval-traps were compared. The second part of these experiments took place in Lavrinhas county (Pinheiros district), where 20 ovitraps and 5 larval-traps were tested. The results showed that the ovitrap was more efficient than larval-traps and were positive even in the presence of natural breeding grounds. It was also observed un the evaluation of the results of "thermonebulization (fog)" that the ovitraps showed strong reduction in the average number of eggs, but this was not observed in the Breteau Index.

Для цитирования: Marques C C, Marques G R, de Brito M, dos Santos Neto L G, Ishibashi V de C, Gomes F de A. [Comparative study of larval and ovitrap efficacy for surveillance of dengue and yellow fever vectors].. Revista de saude publica. 1993. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101993000400002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.