Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2005
Early allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for young adults with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: an intent-to-treat long-term analysis of the BGMT experience.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jourdan Eric, Boiron Jean-Michel, Dastugue Nicole, Vey Norbert, Marit Gérald, Rigal-Huguet Françoise, Molina Lysiane, Fegueux Nathalie, Pigneux Arnaud, Recher Christian, Rossi Jean-François, Attal Michel, Sotto Jean-Jacques, Maraninchi Dominique, Reiffers Josy, Bardou Valerie-Jeanne, Esterni Benjamin, Blaise Didier
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) as an early consolidation for young patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission (CR1) through four successive protocols.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 472 patients who achieved CR1, 182 (38%) had an HLA-identical sibling (donor group), and alloSCT was performed in 171 patients (94%). Of the 290 patients without donor (no-donor group), 62% received an autologous SCT.
RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis based on donor availability, the overall 10-year survival probability was 51% v 43% (P = .11) for the donor and no-donor groups, respectively. A Cox analysis determined that four factors had independent prognostic significance for survival (initial WBC count, French-American-British subtypes, cytogenetic risk, and number of induction courses). This permitted constitution of a simple index that reclassified 21% of the patients compared with usual cytogenetic classification and identified three subpopulations with different outcome and different impact of alloSCT.
CONCLUSION: AlloSCT was associated with a survival advantage for an intermediate-risk group. In other groups, numbers are limited for definitive conclusion. However, early performed alloSCT does not seem to be the optimal treatment of high-risk patients or offer any advantage over intensive chemotherapy in low-risk patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 472 patients who achieved CR1, 182 (38%) had an HLA-identical sibling (donor group), and alloSCT was performed in 171 patients (94%). Of the 290 patients without donor (no-donor group), 62% received an autologous SCT.
RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis based on donor availability, the overall 10-year survival probability was 51% v 43% (P = .11) for the donor and no-donor groups, respectively. A Cox analysis determined that four factors had independent prognostic significance for survival (initial WBC count, French-American-British subtypes, cytogenetic risk, and number of induction courses). This permitted constitution of a simple index that reclassified 21% of the patients compared with usual cytogenetic classification and identified three subpopulations with different outcome and different impact of alloSCT.
CONCLUSION: AlloSCT was associated with a survival advantage for an intermediate-risk group. In other groups, numbers are limited for definitive conclusion. However, early performed alloSCT does not seem to be the optimal treatment of high-risk patients or offer any advantage over intensive chemotherapy in low-risk patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionStem Cell TransplantationTime FactorsTissue and Organ ProcurementTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome