Transplantation proceedings · 2004
Regional versus general anesthesia for donor nephrectomy: effects on graft function.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sener M, Torgay A, Akpek E, Colak T, Karakayali H, Arslan G, Haberal M
Аннотация
Various general and regional anesthesia methods are used successfully in living-donor kidney transplantation. This study compared kidney graft function after general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for donor nephrectomy. The study groups included recipients who received grafts from donors who had undergone nephrectomy under general anesthesia (GA group; n=10), and recipients who received grafts from donors who had combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE group, n=10). Standard continuous epidural anesthesia was administered during all transplantations. Graft function was assessed using scintigraphy and Doppler ultrasonography on days 3 and 7. Urine levels of microalbumin, creatinine, and creatinine clearance rate were measured/calculated in 24-hour urine samples collected on postoperative days 3 and 7. There were no differences on either day 3 or day 7 with respect to glomerular filtration rate, microalbuminuria, or creatinine clearance rate (P >.05 for all). There were also no differences between the groups with respect to other scintigraphic findings on day 3 or day 7 (P >.05 for all). Ultrasonography on day 7 showed significantly higher mean peak systolic flow in the main renal artery in the CSE group than in the GA group (P=.035). The results suggest that GA and CSE for donor nephrectomy have similar effects on kidney graft function in recipients.