Experimental gerontology · 2026
Best available evidence on artificial airway suctioning in critically ill older adults: An evidence-based synthesis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Jun, Lyu Jing, Wu Ni-Hui, Chen Xu, Bai Jiao-Jiao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on the suctioning process for artificial airways in critically ill elderly patients, including suctioning indications, preparation before suctioning, suctioning methods, subglottic suction, and organizational policies, in order to provide evidence-based resources for clinical application.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and evidence sources, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (Australia), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Evidence-Based Medicine Database, Ovid Full-Text Medical Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Database, the Chinese Guideline Network, the World Health Organization official website, and national geriatric medicine associations and critical care associations. The search encompassed publications from database inception through September 2025. Following methodological quality appraisal, relevant evidence was extracted and synthesized.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4 clinical guidelines, 4 expert consensus statements, 1 meta-analysis, 1 evidence summary, and 3 group standards. A total of 20 evidence statements were extracted, addressing 6 key domains: indications for suctioning, pre-suction preparation, suctioning techniques, post-suction care, subglottic suctioning, and institutional policy recommendations.
CONCLUSION: This synthesis provides a comprehensive, multi-dimensional summary of the best available evidence on artificial airway suctioning in critically ill older adults offering a reference framework to inform clinical decision-making and optimize care practices.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and evidence sources, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (Australia), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Evidence-Based Medicine Database, Ovid Full-Text Medical Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Database, the Chinese Guideline Network, the World Health Organization official website, and national geriatric medicine associations and critical care associations. The search encompassed publications from database inception through September 2025. Following methodological quality appraisal, relevant evidence was extracted and synthesized.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4 clinical guidelines, 4 expert consensus statements, 1 meta-analysis, 1 evidence summary, and 3 group standards. A total of 20 evidence statements were extracted, addressing 6 key domains: indications for suctioning, pre-suction preparation, suctioning techniques, post-suction care, subglottic suctioning, and institutional policy recommendations.
CONCLUSION: This synthesis provides a comprehensive, multi-dimensional summary of the best available evidence on artificial airway suctioning in critically ill older adults offering a reference framework to inform clinical decision-making and optimize care practices.