MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fdgth.2026.1745662

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in digital health · 2026

Practical templates for digital health ethics applications in Sweden: lessons from a sensor-based monitoring study.

Zolfaghari Samaneh, Johansson-Pajala Rose-Marie, Marmstål Hammar Lena, Daneshtalab Masoud

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Obtaining ethical approval for digital health research involving vulnerable populations presents significant challenges for researchers, particularly when navigating complex regulatory frameworks like Sweden's ethical review system. Despite official guidelines, researchers often struggle to translate general principles into concrete application documents that satisfy review authorities. This paper presents practical, reusable templates developed through the successful preparation of an ethics application for a radar-based monitoring study of older adults in Sweden. The application, involving cross-border data handling and vulnerable populations, received first-submission approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten) without reviewer comments. We provide structured templates for key application sections, identify common pitfalls, and offer evidence-based guidance for researchers preparing similar applications. These resources are practice-grounded (one approved applications plus practice-based reflections) and are intended to reduce administrative burden and improve application quality; they should be adapted to local institutional requirements.

Для цитирования: Zolfaghari Samaneh, Johansson-Pajala Rose-Marie, Marmstål Hammar Lena, Daneshtalab Masoud. Practical templates for digital health ethics applications in Sweden: lessons from a sensor-based monitoring study.. Frontiers in digital health. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2026.1745662.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.