American heart journal · 2000
Heart transplant center practice patterns affect access to donors and survival of patients classified as status 1 by the United Network of Organ Sharing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Whellan D J, Tudor G, Denofrio D, Abrams J D, Loh E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adult cardiac transplant center practice patterns within a single organ procurement organization on access to donors and survival for patients listed as United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1.
METHODS: A total of 662 patients listed (January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1995) as UNOS status 1 for heart transplantation by the 4 adult cardiac transplant centers in an organ procurement organization were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study to determine differences in clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The specific center at which an individual was listed as UNOS status 1 was a significant independent predictor of receiving a transplant (odds ratios for 3 centers vs center with highest likelihood = 0.73, 0.64, 0.35, respectively; P <. 01). Only 1 center had a significantly increased mortality rate compared with the other centers (odds ratio 2.03, P <.01).
CONCLUSION: Within a single regional organ procurement organization, cardiac transplant centers demonstrate significant variability in the likelihood of transplantation and survival for patients listed as UNOS status 1.
METHODS: A total of 662 patients listed (January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1995) as UNOS status 1 for heart transplantation by the 4 adult cardiac transplant centers in an organ procurement organization were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study to determine differences in clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The specific center at which an individual was listed as UNOS status 1 was a significant independent predictor of receiving a transplant (odds ratios for 3 centers vs center with highest likelihood = 0.73, 0.64, 0.35, respectively; P <. 01). Only 1 center had a significantly increased mortality rate compared with the other centers (odds ratio 2.03, P <.01).
CONCLUSION: Within a single regional organ procurement organization, cardiac transplant centers demonstrate significant variability in the likelihood of transplantation and survival for patients listed as UNOS status 1.