MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.d-25-00023

Медицинская библиотека · Food safety (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026

Establishment of Standard Methods for Listeria monocytogenes Detection from Foods in Japan.

Okada Yumiko, Nakama Akiko, Shimojima Yukako, Ida Miki, Nakamura Hiromi, Otsuka Kayoko, Ebuchi Sumi, Tomaru Akiko, Nishida Tomoko, Yoshida Tomotaka, Matsuoka Hideaki

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In Japan, several standard methods have been established and published for detecting microbes from foods by "the Committee of the Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods (NIHSJ-MMEF)" since 2005. From the results of the Committee's activities, five of them became official Japanese methods including NIHSJ-08 and NIHSJ-09 which were first published in 2011 and 2014 based on ISO 11290-1 and ISO 11290-2 with some modifications. In this study, a working group consisting of five institutions was established to analyze that the modifications using CHROMagar TM Listeria was valid; the method developed was applicable for some Japanese foods such as minced tuna; and what the estimated limit of detection at 50% probability (eLOD50) were. The eLOD50 values were 0.744 CFU/25g for detection from Half-Fraser broth and 1.11 CFU/25 g for detection from Fraser broth, respectively. Finally, this study established and validated the parameters necessary for monitoring food contamination with Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) in Japan.

Для цитирования: Okada Yumiko, Nakama Akiko, Shimojima Yukako, Ida Miki, Nakamura Hiromi, Otsuka Kayoko, Ebuchi Sumi, Tomaru Akiko, Nishida Tomoko, Yoshida Tomotaka, Matsuoka Hideaki. Establishment of Standard Methods for Listeria monocytogenes Detection from Foods in Japan.. Food safety (Tokyo, Japan). 2026. DOI: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.d-25-00023.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.