Alcohol Control Policy in Southeast Asia: A Descriptive Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Assanangkornchai Sawitri, Wichaidit Wit, Amul Gianna Gayle H, Ang Ian Yi Han, Chaiyasong Surasak, Chhoun Pheak, Chong Chean Lin, Chua Andrea Mong Rui, Hairi Noran N, Hanafi Enjeline, Hassan Ahmed S, Htet Kyaw Ko Ko, Low Wah Yun, Medina John Robert Carabeo, Murtani Belinda J, My Hanh Hoang Thi, Vinh Nguyen The, Nontarak Jiraluck, Ong Sok King, Rovira Pol, Shield Kevin, Siste Kristiana, Somphet Vathsana, Sornpaisarn Bundit, Sychareun Vanphanom, Taikeophithoun Chansathit, Teo Yik Ying, Thammavongsa Vassana, Tong Wen Ting, Vichitkunakorn Polathep, Wijaya Andreas Suryo, Qian Yang, Yap Jason Ch, Yi Siyan, Zakariah Nurhaliza, Zayar Nyi Nyi, Zulakmal Hafsah Alwafa, Rehm Jürgen
Аннотация
Southeast Asia plays a vital role in the global alcohol trade, with rapid economic growth and increasing intra-regional travel contributing to shifts in alcohol consumption. This descriptive review of publicly available data sources aims to assess the extent to which alcohol control policies in Southeast Asia align with the World Health Organization (WHO)'s SAFER framework. Data on alcohol consumption, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, religious demographics, and life expectancy were obtained from recent publicly available sources, including the World Bank Group and the WHO. Policy data were collected from official legal documents in each country's official language(s). Measures targeting drink-driving, alcohol availability, and alcohol advertising were most frequently implemented. All countries had some form of alcohol taxation, although levels and structures varied. Treatment services for alcohol use disorders were seldom available. The findings highlight key policy gaps and regional disparities in alcohol regulation. These insights may guide policymakers and stakeholders in developing more effective and harmonized alcohol control strategies. Limitations of the review include the lack of detailed data on policy enforcement and the exclusion of alcohol-related policies not covered by the SAFER framework.