Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue · 2025
[Summary of the best evidence for diaphragmatic function training in mechanically ventilated patients].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jing Jie, Chang Xiaowei, Luo Hongbo, Zhao Mingxi, Cai Baoxiang, Li Zunzhu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the best available evidence regarding diaphragmatic function training in mechanically ventilated patients and to establish a foundation for clinical practice.
METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in databases and official websites including UpToDate, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and Yimaitong. The search period covered from the inception of each database to December 31, 2024. The types of evidence included guideline, clinical decision, expert consensus, systematic review, Meta-analysis, and randomized controlled trial (RCT). Two researchers conducted the literature search, study selection, quality assessment and evidence extraction and synthesis independently.
RESULTS: A total of 16 articles were included, consisting of 1 guideline, 1 clinical decision, 2 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, 3 Meta-analyses, and 5 RCTs. Nineteen pieces of evidence were ultimately categorized into 7 dimensions, including implementation team, intervention timing, training assessment, training methods, management of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), monitoring and safety, and outcome evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: This summary of best evidence for diaphragmatic function training in mechanically ventilated patients is scientifically rigorous and comprehensive, offering a valuable reference for guiding clinical practice.
METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in databases and official websites including UpToDate, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and Yimaitong. The search period covered from the inception of each database to December 31, 2024. The types of evidence included guideline, clinical decision, expert consensus, systematic review, Meta-analysis, and randomized controlled trial (RCT). Two researchers conducted the literature search, study selection, quality assessment and evidence extraction and synthesis independently.
RESULTS: A total of 16 articles were included, consisting of 1 guideline, 1 clinical decision, 2 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, 3 Meta-analyses, and 5 RCTs. Nineteen pieces of evidence were ultimately categorized into 7 dimensions, including implementation team, intervention timing, training assessment, training methods, management of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW), monitoring and safety, and outcome evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: This summary of best evidence for diaphragmatic function training in mechanically ventilated patients is scientifically rigorous and comprehensive, offering a valuable reference for guiding clinical practice.