Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2025
Is it feasible to implement an injury surveillance system for amateur boxing events in Australia? A mixed methods study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alevras Alexander J, Kreps Felicia, Strkalj Aleksandar, Nguyen Jim, Fuller Joel T, Mitchell Rebecca, Lystad Reidar P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing an injury surveillance system for amateur boxing in Australia, and to evaluate an implementation trial of an injury surveillance system.
DESIGN: Mixed methods research.
METHODS: (1) Semi-structured interviews of key informants from the Australian amateur boxing community (i.e. athletes, coaches, promoters, referees, medical professionals, and boxing governing body officials) were transcribed and subjected to a reflexive thematic analysis. (2) Implementation trial of an injury surveillance system at five amateur boxing events in Australia was evaluated using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework indicators; however, the maintenance domain was not evaluated.
RESULTS: Three primary themes were generated in the reflexive thematic analysis: (1) value of data, which included sub-themes on growing the sport, improving athlete performance, and informing educational activities; (2) trust, which was engendered by a strong sense of rapport and connection between the boxing community and the research team; and (3) barriers to implementation, which included sub-themes on fear, resistance to change, and process requirements. The implementation trial involved five amateur boxing events, which comprised a total of 210 registered athletes, of which 181 were eligible to participate in this research. The reach indicator was 81 %, the four effectiveness indicators ranged from 86 % to 100 %, the adoption indicator was 100 %, and implementation indicator was 100 %.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to implement an injury surveillance system and obtain good-quality data in the amateur boxing setting in Australia, but there are potential barriers to implementation at scale.
DESIGN: Mixed methods research.
METHODS: (1) Semi-structured interviews of key informants from the Australian amateur boxing community (i.e. athletes, coaches, promoters, referees, medical professionals, and boxing governing body officials) were transcribed and subjected to a reflexive thematic analysis. (2) Implementation trial of an injury surveillance system at five amateur boxing events in Australia was evaluated using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework indicators; however, the maintenance domain was not evaluated.
RESULTS: Three primary themes were generated in the reflexive thematic analysis: (1) value of data, which included sub-themes on growing the sport, improving athlete performance, and informing educational activities; (2) trust, which was engendered by a strong sense of rapport and connection between the boxing community and the research team; and (3) barriers to implementation, which included sub-themes on fear, resistance to change, and process requirements. The implementation trial involved five amateur boxing events, which comprised a total of 210 registered athletes, of which 181 were eligible to participate in this research. The reach indicator was 81 %, the four effectiveness indicators ranged from 86 % to 100 %, the adoption indicator was 100 %, and implementation indicator was 100 %.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to implement an injury surveillance system and obtain good-quality data in the amateur boxing setting in Australia, but there are potential barriers to implementation at scale.