MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/10731911251357466

Медицинская библиотека · Assessment · 2025

The Big Five Inventory-2 in Korea: Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparisons with the U.S. and Chinese Versions.

Choi Jinsoo, Kim Nanhee, Zhang Bo, Park Sang Woo, Cho Seonghee, Sohn Young Woo, Soto Christopher J, John Oliver P

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) has enjoyed global popularity due to its good balance of content coverage and brevity and has been officially translated into 12 languages in addition to the original English version. The current study aimed to further enhance the cultural accessibility of the BFI-2 by translating it into the Korean language and comprehensively validating the Korean version in two South Korean samples: working adults and college students. Across the two samples, the Korean BFI-2 demonstrated good reliability (e.g., test-retest reliability, Cronbach's alpha), construct validity (e.g., convergent/discriminant validity), and criterion-related validity with a wide range of outcome measures. Additionally, we compared the psychometric properties of the Korean BFI-2 to those of the original English and Chinese versions to further establish its comparability with other language versions. Overall, our results demonstrate that the Korean BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure that can be confidently used by other researchers. Implications, limitations, and future directions were discussed.

Для цитирования: Choi Jinsoo, Kim Nanhee, Zhang Bo, Park Sang Woo, Cho Seonghee, Sohn Young Woo, Soto Christopher J, John Oliver P. The Big Five Inventory-2 in Korea: Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparisons with the U.S. and Chinese Versions.. Assessment. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/10731911251357466.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.