MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5173/ceju.2025.0045

Медицинская библиотека · Central European journal of urology · 2025

A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.

Tomczak Wojciech, Krajewski Wojciech, Grunwald Katarzyna, Chełmoński Adam, Chorbińska Joanna, Nowak Łukasz, Łaszkiewicz Jan, Gurwin Adam, Krajewska Magdalena, Małkiewicz Bartosz, Szydełko Tomasz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition with several etiological factors, affecting up to 20% of the population and exhibiting high recurrence rates. Its strain on healthcare systems, exacerbated by high incidence and recurrence, often results in insufficient time for thorough diagnostics and counselling. Consequently, many patients seek easily accessible online sources of information. This study aimed to assess the readability and availability of online urolithiasis materials across 24 official European languages to compare readability across different source types.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The phrase "kidney stones" was translated into all official European languages, and the first 50 search results for each language were retrieved. Non-functional websites, those requiring accounts or payments, and duplicates were excluded. Relevance was assessed using Google Translate to filter out results lacking medical information. Only patient-oriented materials were included for analysis. Obtained results were then classified by source category, and their readability was assessed using LIX formula.

RESULTS

A total of 723 articles were analysed. The English term yielded the highest number of results, followed by Spanish and Portuguese. Overall, the English articles performed best, being the only language with a mean LIX score below 40, which marks the threshold between "somewhat hard" and "hard" to read. Finnish, Lithuanian, and Hungarian materials had LIX scores significantly exceeding the threshold of 50, classifying them as "very hard to read" and among the most difficult to comprehend.A subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences across the source classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Online materials on kidney stones are generally too complex for patients, limiting their understanding and treatment adherence. Simplification of patient-oriented materials along with artificial intelligence utilisation could enhance comprehension. Improved awareness may promote adherence to preventive measures and help reduce the incidence and economic burden of urolithiasis.

Для цитирования: Tomczak Wojciech, Krajewski Wojciech, Grunwald Katarzyna, Chełmoński Adam, Chorbińska Joanna, Nowak Łukasz, Łaszkiewicz Jan, Gurwin Adam, Krajewska Magdalena, Małkiewicz Bartosz, Szydełko Tomasz. A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.. Central European journal of urology. 2025. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0045.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.