MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/dj13070279

Медицинская библиотека · Dentistry journal · 2025

Evaluation of Chatbot Responses to Text-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Prosthodontic and Restorative Dentistry.

Chau Reinhard Chun Wang, Thu Khaing Myat, Yu Ollie Yiru, Hsung Richard Tai-Chiu, Wang Denny Chon Pei, Man Manuel Wing Ho, Wang John Junwen, Lam Walter Yu Hang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the response accuracy and quality of three AI chatbots-GPT-4.0, Claude-2, and Llama-2-in answering multiple-choice questions in prosthodontic and restorative dentistry.

Methods

A total of 191 text-based multiple-choice questions were selected from the prosthodontic and restorative dentistry sections of the United States Integrated National Board Dental Examination (INBDE) (n = 80) and the United Kingdom Overseas Registration Examination (ORE) (n = 111). These questions were inputted into the chatbots, and the AI-generated answers were compared with the official answer keys to determine their accuracy. Additionally, two dental specialists independently evaluated the rationales accompanying each chatbot response for accuracy, relevance, and comprehensiveness, categorizing them into four distinct ratings. Chi-square and post hoc Z-tests with Bonferroni adjustment were used to analyze the responses. The inter-rater reliability for evaluating the quality of the rationale ratings among specialists was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (κ).

Results

GPT-4.0 (65.4%; n = 125/191) demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of correctly answered multiple-choice questions when compared to Claude-2 (41.9%; n = 80/191) (p < 0.017) and Llama-2 (26.2%; n = 50/191) (p < 0.017). Significant differences were observed in the answer accuracy among all of the chatbots (p < 0.001). In terms of the rationale quality, GPT-4.0 (58.1%; n = 111/191) had a significantly higher proportion of "Correct Answer, Correct Rationale" than Claude-2 (37.2%; n = 71/191) (p < 0.017) and Llama-2 (24.1%; n = 46/191) (p < 0.017). Significant differences were observed in the rationale quality among all of the chatbots (p < 0.001). The inter-rater reliability was very high (κ = 0.83).

Conclusions

GPT-4.0 demonstrated the highest accuracy and quality of reasoning in responding to prosthodontic and restorative dentistry questions. This underscores the varying efficacy of AI chatbots within specialized dental contexts.

Для цитирования: Chau Reinhard Chun Wang, Thu Khaing Myat, Yu Ollie Yiru, Hsung Richard Tai-Chiu, Wang Denny Chon Pei, Man Manuel Wing Ho, Wang John Junwen, Lam Walter Yu Hang. Evaluation of Chatbot Responses to Text-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Prosthodontic and Restorative Dentistry.. Dentistry journal. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/dj13070279.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.