MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116319

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2025

Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Wong Denise L, Fredette Jordan, Hasler Jill, Porpiglia Andrea S, Greco Stephanie H, Reddy Sanjay S, Farma Jeffrey M, Villano Anthony M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fragmented care (FC) is associated with mixed outcomes. This analysis examines FC's impact on retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) treatment.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with non-metastatic, surgically-resected RPS. FC was defined as diagnosis/treatment at >1 facility. Univariable and multivariable analyses examined factors associated with FC and its impact on overall survival.

RESULTS

4976 patients were included; 45.6 ​% experienced FC. Non-FC and FC cohorts were similar. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma were more common in FC cohort, as were poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors (p ​< ​0.05). FC cohort had greater travel distance and time-to-treatment (both p ​< ​0.001). Variables independently associated with FC included urban and rural setting and histology (poorly differentiated and undifferentiated) (all p ​< ​0.05). After controlling for other variables, FC was not associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

FC patients experienced longer distance travelled and time-to-treatment without survival impact. National emphasis must be placed on broadening access to equitable, high-quality sarcoma care.

Для цитирования: Wong Denise L, Fredette Jordan, Hasler Jill, Porpiglia Andrea S, Greco Stephanie H, Reddy Sanjay S, Farma Jeffrey M, Villano Anthony M. Impact of fragmented care on retroperitoneal sarcomas.. American journal of surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116319.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.