Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Analysis of the European Union's National Cancer Control Programs: Meeting the Needs of People with Intellectual Disabilities.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kowalczyk Oliwia, Ambrocio Rainer Pier Paolo M, Vuković Vladimir, Denieffe Suzanne, Denny Margaret
Аннотация
Background/Objectives: People with intellectual disabilities (IDs), representing approximately 200 million individuals globally (3% of the world's population), face significant disparities in cancer prevention and care. While cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, the intersection of cancer care and intellectual disability presents unique challenges that demand specialized attention within healthcare systems. This study evaluates the current status and effectiveness of National Cancer Control Programs (NCCPs) for individuals with intellectual disabilities across the European Union. Methods: A systematic analysis was conducted of 27 European Union member states' National Cancer Control Programs between August 2023 and August 2024. The study utilized the International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) framework, examining English-language documents and official translations to ensure analytical consistency. Results: Our analysis reveals that while all 27 EU member states have established NCCPs, significant variations exist in their approach to ID-specific provisions, with implementation scores ranging from 1 (basic) to 3 (comprehensive). Key findings indicate that only 15% of programs have comprehensive ID-specific provisions, while 60% maintain moderate adaptations and 25% offer basic provisions. Specific gaps identified include limited specialized healthcare provider training (present in only 7.5% of programs) and inadequate screening program adaptations. Conclusions: Based on a quantitative assessment of implementation status and program components, we propose evidence-based recommendations emphasizing the urgent need for enhanced ID-specific provisions in NCCPs.