HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
Preferred content, construct, and duration of a fellowship structure in HPB surgery: a cross-sectional, pan-European survey among trainees and trainers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reese Tim, Gilg Stefan, Besselink Marc G, Soreide Kjetil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fellowships in HPB surgery are lacking across Europe. The aim of this survey was to investigate preferences towards an HPB-fellowship structure among trainees and trainers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional pan-European survey of trainees and consultants in HPB across Europe. Preferred content, duration and construct of a fellowship program was explored.
RESULTS: Responses from 221 eligible participants were analysed, covering all European regions (40 % trainees, of which 31 % women). Preferred duration was 2 years (53 %), international availability (71 %) and in English language (by two-thirds overall; 74 % among trainees). A majority About two-thirds (63 %) preferred an official fellowship teaching curriculum provided by the E-AHPBA. Most The vast majority of participants (n = 211; 95 %) supported accreditation of HPB-fellowships by the E-AHPBA. Trainees reported higher priorities towards technical training (i.e. time in operating room; first surgeon opportunity; minimal-invasive technique training) than consultants, while time for non-operative activities (i.e. ward rounds; responsibility for multidisciplinary team meetings etc) was valued higher by consultants.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified preferences and needs towards construct and competence in HPB fellowships with strong support for involvement of E-AHPBA in providing a involvement teaching curriculum and accreditation. A unified HPB fellowship construct and registry across Europe guided by E-AHPBA may take this into consideration.
METHODS: A cross-sectional pan-European survey of trainees and consultants in HPB across Europe. Preferred content, duration and construct of a fellowship program was explored.
RESULTS: Responses from 221 eligible participants were analysed, covering all European regions (40 % trainees, of which 31 % women). Preferred duration was 2 years (53 %), international availability (71 %) and in English language (by two-thirds overall; 74 % among trainees). A majority About two-thirds (63 %) preferred an official fellowship teaching curriculum provided by the E-AHPBA. Most The vast majority of participants (n = 211; 95 %) supported accreditation of HPB-fellowships by the E-AHPBA. Trainees reported higher priorities towards technical training (i.e. time in operating room; first surgeon opportunity; minimal-invasive technique training) than consultants, while time for non-operative activities (i.e. ward rounds; responsibility for multidisciplinary team meetings etc) was valued higher by consultants.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified preferences and needs towards construct and competence in HPB fellowships with strong support for involvement of E-AHPBA in providing a involvement teaching curriculum and accreditation. A unified HPB fellowship construct and registry across Europe guided by E-AHPBA may take this into consideration.