DOI 10.64898/2026.09.23.26363671
A neurocognitive speech taxonomy for voice biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Voice data combined with large language models may detect cognitive impairment, yet an interpretable framework has not been formally established. We developed and validated a scalable and interpretable framework, the Neurocognitive Speech Taxonomy (NST).
METHODS
NST maps 314 voice features to 7 neurocognitive domains derived from neuropsychology, speech pathology, neurology and related fields. The domains capture features including articulatory precision, cognitive-linguistic, executive fluency & planning, phonation & laryngeal control, prosodic modulation, lexical-semantic, and morphosyntactic complexity. We evaluated NST structural stability, clinical validity and racial-educational equity in three cohorts (total N = 1,479). Cohort data included demographic and neuropsychological evaluations and AD biomarker status. We tested whether NST scores distinguish cognitive status (unimpaired vs impaired) and AD-biomarker status, track cognitive change, and correlate with AD neuroimaging measures.
RESULTS
NST showed stable cross-cohort structure (Mantel r = 0.71-0.77) and differentiated MCI ( d = -0.39) and AD biomarker status ( d = -0.23). NST tracked longitudinal cognitive change, correlated with hippocampal volume (r up to 0.28, P < .001), and showed smaller racial and educational disparities relative to standard cognitive testing (NST d = 0.03-0.33, MoCA d = 0.37-0.72).
DISCUSSION: NST provides a validated neurocognitive construct that facilitates interpretation of AI-driven voice biomarkers of AD. This study was not registered in a public trials registry.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.