Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Observational Analysis of Point-of-Care Lactate Plus™ Meter in Preclinical Trauma Models.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gaeth Catharina, Duarte Jamila, Rodriguez Alvaro, Powers Amber, Stone Randolph
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Blood lactate concentration is often used to assess systemic hypoperfusion, tissue hypoxia, and sepsis in trauma patients and serves as a prognostic indicator and marker of response to therapy. Point-of-care (POC) devices provide rapid lactate measurements with a single drop of blood. In this study, lactate values from whole blood, measured with two POC devices, Abbott i-STAT® and the Nova Biomedical Lactate (LA) Plus™ meter, are compared.
METHODS: An observational analysis of 760 blood samples from four preclinical trauma animal models was performed. Lactate was measured simultaneously with two POC devices (i-STAT® and the Lactate Plus™ meter). The evaluation in the form of a Bland-Altman diagram showed the agreement of the tests.
RESULTS: The Spearman correlation was 0.9180 (95% CI 0.9056 to 0.9288) for i-STAT® vs. the LA Plus™ meter. Both tests showed a significant increase in lactate after injury (p < 0.05). The i-STAT® showed a small bias compared to the LA Plus™ meter (-0.0227 ± 0.4542 with 95% limits of agreement from -0.09129 to 0.8675). The LA Plus™ meter showed slightly higher values overall (0.0227 mmol/L), but the i-STAT® showed higher results at lactate levels above 2.5 mmol/L.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed similarity in performance between the two devices suggests that both are capable of reliably measuring lactate levels in a trauma situation. The LA Plus™ meter provides fast results with only one drop of blood. This study supports the prehospital use of POC devices.
METHODS: An observational analysis of 760 blood samples from four preclinical trauma animal models was performed. Lactate was measured simultaneously with two POC devices (i-STAT® and the Lactate Plus™ meter). The evaluation in the form of a Bland-Altman diagram showed the agreement of the tests.
RESULTS: The Spearman correlation was 0.9180 (95% CI 0.9056 to 0.9288) for i-STAT® vs. the LA Plus™ meter. Both tests showed a significant increase in lactate after injury (p < 0.05). The i-STAT® showed a small bias compared to the LA Plus™ meter (-0.0227 ± 0.4542 with 95% limits of agreement from -0.09129 to 0.8675). The LA Plus™ meter showed slightly higher values overall (0.0227 mmol/L), but the i-STAT® showed higher results at lactate levels above 2.5 mmol/L.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed similarity in performance between the two devices suggests that both are capable of reliably measuring lactate levels in a trauma situation. The LA Plus™ meter provides fast results with only one drop of blood. This study supports the prehospital use of POC devices.