Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2024
Real-world safety of dapagliflozin plus metformin in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: Post-hoc analysis of the DONATE study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Lixin, Wang Jing, Li Li, Yuan Lin, Chen Sheng, Wang Hui, Li Tonghuan, Qi Lin, Yang Hong
Аннотация
AIM: DONATE (NCT03156985) is a large-scale real-world study investigating the safety of dapagliflozin in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This post-hoc analysis aims to further evaluate the real-world safety of dapagliflozin plus metformin.
METHODS: Safety outcomes were assessed in patients receiving concomitant dapagliflozin and metformin, with or without other antidiabetics. The safety of dapagliflozin-based dual-therapies and dapagliflozin and metformin-based triple-therapies were also analysed.
RESULTS: Among the 2,990 patients in DONATE, 2,165 (72.4%) received concomitant metformin. Among these 2,165 patients, 780 (36.0%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), 129 (6.0%) experienced serious AE (SAE), and 96 (4.4%) experienced AE leading to dapagliflozin discontinuation. The most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (4.0%), urinary tract infection (UTI, 2.1%) and constipation (1.5%). The most common AEs of special interest of dapagliflozin were UTI (2.3%), genital tract infection (1.5%) and hypoglycaemia (1.1%). In the dapagliflozin and metformin dual-therapy subgroup, the incidences of AE, SAE and AE leading to dapagliflozin discontinuation were 26.7%, 2.5%, and 1.9%, respectively, numerically lower than that of the total population and most other dual-therapy subgroups. These patients also had numerically improved metabolic outcomes than baseline.
CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin and metformin combination therapy is well-tolerated in real-world Chinese T2DM patients.
METHODS: Safety outcomes were assessed in patients receiving concomitant dapagliflozin and metformin, with or without other antidiabetics. The safety of dapagliflozin-based dual-therapies and dapagliflozin and metformin-based triple-therapies were also analysed.
RESULTS: Among the 2,990 patients in DONATE, 2,165 (72.4%) received concomitant metformin. Among these 2,165 patients, 780 (36.0%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), 129 (6.0%) experienced serious AE (SAE), and 96 (4.4%) experienced AE leading to dapagliflozin discontinuation. The most common AEs were upper respiratory tract infection (4.0%), urinary tract infection (UTI, 2.1%) and constipation (1.5%). The most common AEs of special interest of dapagliflozin were UTI (2.3%), genital tract infection (1.5%) and hypoglycaemia (1.1%). In the dapagliflozin and metformin dual-therapy subgroup, the incidences of AE, SAE and AE leading to dapagliflozin discontinuation were 26.7%, 2.5%, and 1.9%, respectively, numerically lower than that of the total population and most other dual-therapy subgroups. These patients also had numerically improved metabolic outcomes than baseline.
CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin and metformin combination therapy is well-tolerated in real-world Chinese T2DM patients.