Psychiatrische Praxis · 2026
[Brief Evaluation of the Adapted Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (A-ADOS) in Adults with Intellectual Disability].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keller Peer Christian, Sappok Tanja
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the application of the adapted Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (A-ADOS) in adults with intellectual disabilities and suspected autism spectrum disorder.
METHODS: In 14 individuals from this cohort, guideline-compliant autism diagnostics were conducted. The diagnosis was established in in a multidisciplinary consensus conference, considering all collected findings. The A-ADOS was additionally administered in a non-blinded manner; sensitivity and specificity were evaluated based on the case conference decisions.
RESULTS: The A-ADOS was feasible in 12 out of 14 individuals (86%). The A-ADOS showed a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 100%.
CONCLUSION: The A-ADOS proves to be feasible and diagnostically promising. Due to methodological limitations, the results are preliminary; a prospective, blinded study is required to validate the instrument.
METHODS: In 14 individuals from this cohort, guideline-compliant autism diagnostics were conducted. The diagnosis was established in in a multidisciplinary consensus conference, considering all collected findings. The A-ADOS was additionally administered in a non-blinded manner; sensitivity and specificity were evaluated based on the case conference decisions.
RESULTS: The A-ADOS was feasible in 12 out of 14 individuals (86%). The A-ADOS showed a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 100%.
CONCLUSION: The A-ADOS proves to be feasible and diagnostically promising. Due to methodological limitations, the results are preliminary; a prospective, blinded study is required to validate the instrument.