International orthopaedics · 2026
Humeral osteotomy rate during revision shoulder arthroplasty for a standard-length uncemented low-filling humeral stem: a multicenter study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vismara Valeria, Murillo Nieto Carlos, Glanz Ludovic, Sauzieres Philippe, Laumonerie Pierre, Kany Jean, Valenti Philippe, Ciais Gregoire
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The need for revision shoulder arthroplasty is progressively increasing. Removal of a well-fixed humeral standard stem during revision shoulder arthroplasty may require techniques such as humeral osteotomy, which may contribute to longer surgical time, loss of humeral bone stock and lower clinical outcomes; however, the incidence and influence of stem design remain incompletely defined.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of humeral osteotomy during revision shoulder arthroplasty of a single uncemented, standard-length, low-filling-profile humeral stem design with a metaphyseal coating and a smooth diaphyseal stem (Arrow, FH Orthopedics).
METHODS: In a retrospective design, all revision shoulder arthroplasty which require stem revision performed at three high-volume centres between 2000 and 2023 were evaluated. Patients were included if in the primary surgery an uncemented, standard-length, low-filling-profile humeral stem design (Arrow, FH Orthopedics) was used. Cemented stems were excluded from the analysis. Demographic data, type of primary surgery (anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA), reason for revision and need for humeral osteotomy were recorded. The primary outcome was the need for humeral osteotomy during revision surgery. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate possible risk factors.
RESULTS: Humeral osteotomy was required in 6% (4/64) of revisions. Patient age, sex, type of primary Implant and revision aetiology were not associated with increased risk for humeral osteotomy (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Humeral osteotomy was required in approximately 6% of revision procedures. An uncemented, standard-length stem with a low-filling-profile design could explain the very low rates of humeral osteotomy compared to literature data.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of humeral osteotomy during revision shoulder arthroplasty of a single uncemented, standard-length, low-filling-profile humeral stem design with a metaphyseal coating and a smooth diaphyseal stem (Arrow, FH Orthopedics).
METHODS: In a retrospective design, all revision shoulder arthroplasty which require stem revision performed at three high-volume centres between 2000 and 2023 were evaluated. Patients were included if in the primary surgery an uncemented, standard-length, low-filling-profile humeral stem design (Arrow, FH Orthopedics) was used. Cemented stems were excluded from the analysis. Demographic data, type of primary surgery (anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA), reason for revision and need for humeral osteotomy were recorded. The primary outcome was the need for humeral osteotomy during revision surgery. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate possible risk factors.
RESULTS: Humeral osteotomy was required in 6% (4/64) of revisions. Patient age, sex, type of primary Implant and revision aetiology were not associated with increased risk for humeral osteotomy (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Humeral osteotomy was required in approximately 6% of revision procedures. An uncemented, standard-length stem with a low-filling-profile design could explain the very low rates of humeral osteotomy compared to literature data.