Academic radiology · 2026
An AI-Powered Voice-Driven Oral Board Examination Simulator for Radiology Training: A Pilot Feasibility Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reddy Rohit, Brofman Nicole, Ott Nicholas, Litardo Nicolas, Wahood Waseem, Hernandez Adiel, Lampen-Sachar Katharine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Radiology is transitioning radiology certifying examinations to a virtual oral format in 2028, creating need for scalable preparation tools, as traditional mock orals require significant faculty resources.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate feasibility, usability, and educational value of an AI-powered voice-driven oral board examination simulator.
METHODS: In this IRB-approved single-institution pilot (May 2025-June 2026), we developed RadBoardsAI, a web-based platform with real-time voice interaction (Whisper, GPT-4o, text-to-speech), deterministic examiner constraints, and ABR sample cases. Residents (PGY-2-PGY-5) completed simulated examinations and pre/post surveys.
RESULTS: Eight completed baselines; four (50%) post-intervention; 75% had no prior mock oral experience. Baseline confidence (2.57 ± 0.98) and preparedness (2.14 ± 0.90) were low, with moderate stress (3.14 ± 0.90). Post-intervention (n = 4) showed improved confidence (3.50; SMD = + 0.95) and preparedness (3.50; SMD = + 1.51), decreased stress (1.50; SMD = -1.83), and mean SUS 70.0 ± 15.1 (Good). Qualitative feedback identified image labeling and case expansion as priorities.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot feasibility study, RadBoardsAI demonstrates technical feasibility and acceptability among radiology residents, addressing faculty constraints while providing standardized oral board preparation.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate feasibility, usability, and educational value of an AI-powered voice-driven oral board examination simulator.
METHODS: In this IRB-approved single-institution pilot (May 2025-June 2026), we developed RadBoardsAI, a web-based platform with real-time voice interaction (Whisper, GPT-4o, text-to-speech), deterministic examiner constraints, and ABR sample cases. Residents (PGY-2-PGY-5) completed simulated examinations and pre/post surveys.
RESULTS: Eight completed baselines; four (50%) post-intervention; 75% had no prior mock oral experience. Baseline confidence (2.57 ± 0.98) and preparedness (2.14 ± 0.90) were low, with moderate stress (3.14 ± 0.90). Post-intervention (n = 4) showed improved confidence (3.50; SMD = + 0.95) and preparedness (3.50; SMD = + 1.51), decreased stress (1.50; SMD = -1.83), and mean SUS 70.0 ± 15.1 (Good). Qualitative feedback identified image labeling and case expansion as priorities.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot feasibility study, RadBoardsAI demonstrates technical feasibility and acceptability among radiology residents, addressing faculty constraints while providing standardized oral board preparation.