Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine · 2026
Adductor Sling and Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Fixation Both Yield High Postoperative Functional Scores After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guiloff Krauss Rodrigo, Arteaga Correa José Tomás, Isla Villanueva Jorge, Prado García José Luis, Figueroa Berríos Francisco, Vaisman Burucker Alex, Calvo Rodriguez Rafael, Figueroa Poblete David
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Adductor sling (AS) and anatomic femoral tunnel (AFT) are femoral-side fixation options for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), but direct comparative evidence remains limited. We hypothesized similar final Kujala scores and similar outcomes regarding redislocation, residual subjective instability, and subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery with both techniques.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter comparative cohort included 84 knees in 78 skeletally mature patients who underwent MPFLR for recurrent lateral patellar instability between 2017 and 2024 (19 AS; 65 AFT). Previous ipsilateral surgery and concomitant trochleoplasty, corrective femoral osteotomy, or tibial osteotomy other than tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) were exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was final Kujala score. An exploratory parsimonious regression adjusted for age, sex, follow-up duration, and TTO; cluster-robust standard errors accounted for bilateral knees.
RESULTS: Final Kujala, redislocation, and residual-instability outcomes were available for 80 knees (18 AS; 62 AFT). Median follow-up was 35.6 months after AS and 55.6 months after AFT (p<0.001). Concomitant TTO was more frequent after AFT than AS fixation (66.2% versus 31.6%; p=0.009). Median Kujala scores were 91.0 and 94.0 (difference, -3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), -8.5 to 2.5; p=0.456). Redislocation occurred in 0/18 AS and 2/62 AFT knees (p=1.000). Residual instability occurred in 6/18 (33.3%) and 13/62 (21.0%), respectively (risk difference, 12.4%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 36.7%; p=0.347). No subsequent procedures occurred after AS fixation; four occurred after AFT fixation, including two in the same patient for the same complication. In the parsimonious adjusted model, the mean difference for AS versus AFT was -5.31 points (95% CI, -12.61 to 1.99; p=0.151).
CONCLUSION: Both AS and AFT fixation yielded high postoperative functional scores and low redislocation rates. Neither analysis identified a clear between-technique difference in final Kujala score. Patient-reported residual instability was more common after AS fixation, although the estimate was imprecise and based on a retrospective, nonstandardized assessment. Prospective studies with standardized indications and instability assessments should clarify which patient subgroups benefit from each technique.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter comparative cohort included 84 knees in 78 skeletally mature patients who underwent MPFLR for recurrent lateral patellar instability between 2017 and 2024 (19 AS; 65 AFT). Previous ipsilateral surgery and concomitant trochleoplasty, corrective femoral osteotomy, or tibial osteotomy other than tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) were exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was final Kujala score. An exploratory parsimonious regression adjusted for age, sex, follow-up duration, and TTO; cluster-robust standard errors accounted for bilateral knees.
RESULTS: Final Kujala, redislocation, and residual-instability outcomes were available for 80 knees (18 AS; 62 AFT). Median follow-up was 35.6 months after AS and 55.6 months after AFT (p<0.001). Concomitant TTO was more frequent after AFT than AS fixation (66.2% versus 31.6%; p=0.009). Median Kujala scores were 91.0 and 94.0 (difference, -3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), -8.5 to 2.5; p=0.456). Redislocation occurred in 0/18 AS and 2/62 AFT knees (p=1.000). Residual instability occurred in 6/18 (33.3%) and 13/62 (21.0%), respectively (risk difference, 12.4%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 36.7%; p=0.347). No subsequent procedures occurred after AS fixation; four occurred after AFT fixation, including two in the same patient for the same complication. In the parsimonious adjusted model, the mean difference for AS versus AFT was -5.31 points (95% CI, -12.61 to 1.99; p=0.151).
CONCLUSION: Both AS and AFT fixation yielded high postoperative functional scores and low redislocation rates. Neither analysis identified a clear between-technique difference in final Kujala score. Patient-reported residual instability was more common after AS fixation, although the estimate was imprecise and based on a retrospective, nonstandardized assessment. Prospective studies with standardized indications and instability assessments should clarify which patient subgroups benefit from each technique.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.