MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.52935/26.15184.1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied juvenile justice services · 2026

Harnessing Implementation Science to Reform Juvenile Services: A Roadmap for Change.

Ordorica Catalina, Wijaya Clarisa, Witzig Jax, Patino Viviana, Angelino Ramiro, Castillo Gabriela, Huber Holly, Rudd Brittany

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The research-to-practice gap in juvenile services is substantial, as it is in most other fields. This gap contributes to adverse psychosocial outcomes for youth that are juvenile-legal service and system-involved, such as mental health concerns. Implementation science emerged to reduce discrepancies between research and practice. This article introduces implementation science and explains how it may be harnessed to enhance youth outcomes and bring about systemic change in the juvenile-legal services sector. An overview of implementation science is provided, with a particular emphasis on accelerating the adoption of evidence-based practices, like restorative justice as a diversionary tactic and graduated response as an alternative approach towards probationary youth, within the juvenile-legal system. Given the field's focus on implementation, we emphasize opportunities for researchers and practitioners to incorporate implementation science into practice and research, and we offer helpful examples and suggestions for juvenile services practitioners looking to integrate evidence-based methods in their contexts.

Для цитирования: Ordorica Catalina, Wijaya Clarisa, Witzig Jax, Patino Viviana, Angelino Ramiro, Castillo Gabriela, Huber Holly, Rudd Brittany. Harnessing Implementation Science to Reform Juvenile Services: A Roadmap for Change.. Journal of applied juvenile justice services. 2026. DOI: 10.52935/26.15184.1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.