Public health reviews · 2026
Smoking cessation in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of vulnerability approaches and expectant father involvement.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barrera Bibiana, Ahmed Furqan, Brand Tilman, Zeeb Hajo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate behavioral and psychosocial smoking cessation interventions and second-hand smoke reduction strategies in pregnancy, focusing on sociocultural vulnerability approaches and expectant father involvement.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (Joanna Briggs Institute methodology; PRISMA 2020). MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and CINAHL were searched to October 2023; exclusively pharmacological interventions were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses examined five vulnerability approaches and two levels of father involvement. Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies (41 RCTs) were included. Individual counseling was most effective for maternal cessation (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.39-1.99). Vulnerability-adapted and standard interventions were comparably effective overall (OR = 1.55 vs. 1.51); socioeconomic inclusiveness yielded the largest subgroup effect (OR = 2.51), although subgroup estimates were exploratory (low to very low certainty). Father involvement did not significantly improve maternal cessation (OR = 1.12), but father-directed interventions were highly effective for paternal cessation (OR = 2.18; high-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSION: Behavioral interventions, particularly individual counseling, are effective in pregnancy. Father-directed approaches merit consideration in antenatal care, although evidence derives from four trials. Socioeconomically inclusive and mental health-integrated interventions are promising but require confirmation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7, identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (Joanna Briggs Institute methodology; PRISMA 2020). MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and CINAHL were searched to October 2023; exclusively pharmacological interventions were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses examined five vulnerability approaches and two levels of father involvement. Protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies (41 RCTs) were included. Individual counseling was most effective for maternal cessation (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.39-1.99). Vulnerability-adapted and standard interventions were comparably effective overall (OR = 1.55 vs. 1.51); socioeconomic inclusiveness yielded the largest subgroup effect (OR = 2.51), although subgroup estimates were exploratory (low to very low certainty). Father involvement did not significantly improve maternal cessation (OR = 1.12), but father-directed interventions were highly effective for paternal cessation (OR = 2.18; high-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSION: Behavioral interventions, particularly individual counseling, are effective in pregnancy. Father-directed approaches merit consideration in antenatal care, although evidence derives from four trials. Socioeconomically inclusive and mental health-integrated interventions are promising but require confirmation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7, identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/DUYF7.