Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026
Pre-competitive anxiety, self-confidence, and technical-tactical performance in professional kickboxing athletes: differences between winners and defeated athletes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Silva Duarte Jonatas Deivyson Reis, Robalino Johan, Apollaro Gennaro, Gençoğlu Cebrail, Ulupınar Süleyman, Özbay Serhat, Ahmedov Farruh, Fett Carlos Alexandre
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare pre-competitive anxiety and self-confidence levels, as well as technical-tactical aspects, between winning and defeated professional kickboxers, and to examine the association of these variables with match outcomes.
METHODS: Twenty professional kickboxers (19 males and 1 female) participated in the study, including 10 winners and 10 defeated athletes. Somatic anxiety, cognitive anxiety, and self-confidence were assessed using the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). Technical-tactical variables (attacks, efficiency, and efficacy) were analyzed using video recordings of the matches. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and binary logistic regression, with effect sizes and reliability indices reported.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between winners and losers in psychological variables (p > 0.05). However, winners demonstrated a higher attack volume (p = 0.040; Cohen's d = 0.98) and greater efficacy (p = 0.024; d = 1.10), while no differences were found in efficiency between groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, offensive output was descriptively lower in the final round in both groups, although this reduction did not reach statistical significance. Finally, only attack volume showed a trend toward association with victory (p = 0.052), corresponding to an approximately 2% increase in the odds of victory (95% CI 1.000 to 1.042).
CONCLUSION: Competitive success in professional kickboxing is related to greater offensive volume and efficacy, whereas striking efficiency and pre-competitive psychological variables do not differentiate winners from defeated athletes in our sample universe.
METHODS: Twenty professional kickboxers (19 males and 1 female) participated in the study, including 10 winners and 10 defeated athletes. Somatic anxiety, cognitive anxiety, and self-confidence were assessed using the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). Technical-tactical variables (attacks, efficiency, and efficacy) were analyzed using video recordings of the matches. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and binary logistic regression, with effect sizes and reliability indices reported.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between winners and losers in psychological variables (p > 0.05). However, winners demonstrated a higher attack volume (p = 0.040; Cohen's d = 0.98) and greater efficacy (p = 0.024; d = 1.10), while no differences were found in efficiency between groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, offensive output was descriptively lower in the final round in both groups, although this reduction did not reach statistical significance. Finally, only attack volume showed a trend toward association with victory (p = 0.052), corresponding to an approximately 2% increase in the odds of victory (95% CI 1.000 to 1.042).
CONCLUSION: Competitive success in professional kickboxing is related to greater offensive volume and efficacy, whereas striking efficiency and pre-competitive psychological variables do not differentiate winners from defeated athletes in our sample universe.