DOI 10.1007/s11701-026-04003-2
Phase-specific workflow maturation during early institutional implementation of Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective single-center study.
Аннотация
Phase-specific workflow maturation during institutional Aquablation implementation remains incompletely characterized. We retrospectively analyzed the first 50 consecutive procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a Taiwanese tertiary center. Institutional chronological case number was modeled continuously with preoperative prostate-volume adjustment and heteroskedasticity-robust inference. Outcomes were total operative time and planning, waterjet, and adjunct phases. Three-knot restricted cubic splines examined nonlinearity; sensitivity analyses restricted the cohort to the dominant surgeon and adjusted for anatomical case mix. Mean total time was 64.8 ± 23.6 min; planning, waterjet, and adjunct times were 22.4 ± 7.4, 5.8 ± 2.4, and 36.6 ± 15.8 min. Adjusted linear case-number coefficients were - 0.513, - 0.336, - 0.047, and - 0.130 min/case, respectively. The total-time 95% confidence interval was - 0.759 to - 0.267; the adjunct interval was - 0.311 to 0.050 (p = 0.152). Inverse total, planning, and waterjet associations persisted in sensitivity analyses. Adjunct spline associations were significant overall (p = 0.028) and for nonlinearity (p = 0.009). Six patients (12%) had postoperative complications; four underwent reintervention under general anesthesia and two received transfusions, with overlapping events. Postoperative functional and imaging findings were exploratory available-case outcomes. Institutional workflow maturation was clearest in planning and the composite waterjet phase. Adjunct finishing remained the largest component and showed an exploratory nonlinear chronological association.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.