MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2196/83090

Медицинская библиотека · JMIR formative research · 2026

Validity of Galaxy Watch for Estimating Energy Expenditure During Intermittent Running: Cross-Sectional Study.

Ferreira Alexandre Reis Pires, Inoue Allan, Barbosa Ramon Ludman Martins, Hayek Cassio, Reis Mateus, Alcântara João Arthur, Shigueoka Augusto Hirao, Dos Santos Marcelo Rodrigues

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Smartwatches have gained popularity for their potential to provide accurate measurements of various physiological parameters. However, the validity of energy expenditure (EE) across different smartwatch models remains a topic of ongoing investigation. Discrepancies between results obtained from different models and gold standard methods are particularly critical across varying exercise intensities and types, as validation studies have demonstrated overestimation when wearable activity monitors are compared with indirect calorimetry.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the accuracy of 2 versions of the Samsung smartwatch (Galaxy Watch [GW] 6 and 7) in measuring EE during intermittent moderate-intensity running exercises, using indirect calorimetry as the gold standard method.

METHODS

This study included 148 healthy adults, comprising 80 men and 68 women. Participants performed intermittent treadmill running, consisting of walking at 5 km·h⁻¹ for 1 minute and running between 8 and 16 km·h⁻¹ for 2 minutes, based on participant preference, for a total duration of 27 minutes. The GW6 and GW7 models were used and EE was measured by indirect calorimetry using a wearable portable metabolic gas analysis system (K5; Cosmed), which is considered a gold standard method.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the GW models and the K5. The K5 showed a mean EE of 213.60 (SD 43.04) kilocalories, compared with 219.53 (SD 35.70) kilocalories for the GW6 and 202.67 (SD 47.42) kilocalories for the GW7 (all P>.05). Good Spearman correlations (0.63-0.70) and moderate intraclass correlation coefficients (0.65-0.74) were found. Mean absolute percentage error values ranged from 10.10% to 12.55%. Bland-Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement for all comparisons (K5 vs GW6 and GW7, -61.93 to 65.80 kcal).

CONCLUSIONS

The GW6 and GW7 devices showed moderate validity for estimating EE during intermittent running exercises, demonstrating the suitability of the GW as a low-cost and practical wearable option for daily physical activities.

Для цитирования: Ferreira Alexandre Reis Pires, Inoue Allan, Barbosa Ramon Ludman Martins, Hayek Cassio, Reis Mateus, Alcântara João Arthur, Shigueoka Augusto Hirao, Dos Santos Marcelo Rodrigues. Validity of Galaxy Watch for Estimating Energy Expenditure During Intermittent Running: Cross-Sectional Study.. JMIR formative research. 2026. DOI: 10.2196/83090.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.