The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness · 2025
Plyometric training enhances jump, sprint, and agility performance across different surface types: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Ikheon, Kwon Junhyeong, Kyun Ihyuk, Lee Dong Hoon, Lee Sae Yong
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated and quantified the effects of plyometric training (PT) on soft versus rigid surfaces on jump, sprint, and agility performance.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SportDiscuss, and Web of Science from January 1980 to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials examining PT interventions on the lower limbs with surface descriptions were included. Data extracted by two independent reviewers comprised: 1) the name of the first author and year of publication; 2) study design and participant characteristics; 3) PT program details; and 4) main outcome measures.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis revealed that soft-surface PT significantly increased the vertical jump height (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.83; [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 1.07]), while rigid-surface PT also produced significant improvements in jump height (SMD, 0.98; [95% CI 0.68, 1.28]). For horizontal jump performance, soft-surface PT showed significant effects (SMD, 0.96; [95% CI 0.64, 1.27]), while rigid-surface PT demonstrated moderate effects (SMD, 0.78; [95% CI 0.5, 1.05]). Both soft- and rigid-surface PT significantly reduced sprint time (SMD, -1.03; [95% CI -1.24, -0.81] and SMD, -0.89; [95% CI -1.22, -0.57], respectively) and enhanced agility performance (SMD, -1.07; [95% CI -1.34, -0.80]).
CONCLUSIONS: PT significantly enhanced physical performance outcomes, regardless of the surface type. Practitioners may not need to prioritize the specific surface type when implementing PT programs aimed at improving jump, sprint, and agility performances.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SportDiscuss, and Web of Science from January 1980 to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials examining PT interventions on the lower limbs with surface descriptions were included. Data extracted by two independent reviewers comprised: 1) the name of the first author and year of publication; 2) study design and participant characteristics; 3) PT program details; and 4) main outcome measures.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis revealed that soft-surface PT significantly increased the vertical jump height (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.83; [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 1.07]), while rigid-surface PT also produced significant improvements in jump height (SMD, 0.98; [95% CI 0.68, 1.28]). For horizontal jump performance, soft-surface PT showed significant effects (SMD, 0.96; [95% CI 0.64, 1.27]), while rigid-surface PT demonstrated moderate effects (SMD, 0.78; [95% CI 0.5, 1.05]). Both soft- and rigid-surface PT significantly reduced sprint time (SMD, -1.03; [95% CI -1.24, -0.81] and SMD, -0.89; [95% CI -1.22, -0.57], respectively) and enhanced agility performance (SMD, -1.07; [95% CI -1.34, -0.80]).
CONCLUSIONS: PT significantly enhanced physical performance outcomes, regardless of the surface type. Practitioners may not need to prioritize the specific surface type when implementing PT programs aimed at improving jump, sprint, and agility performances.