MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13059-025-03719-y

Медицинская библиотека · Genome biology · 2025

Comparative benchmarking of single-cell clustering algorithms for transcriptomic and proteomic data.

Yin Yu-Hang, Wang Fang, Li Wei, Liu Qiaoming, Zhou Shengming, Zhou Murong, Jiang Zhongjun, Yu Dong-Jun, Wang Guohua

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Differences in data distribution, feature dimensions, and quality between different single-cell modalities pose challenges for clustering. Although clustering algorithms have been developed for single-cell transcriptomic or proteomic data, their performance across different omics data types and integration scenarios remains poorly investigated, which limits the selection of methods and future method development.

RESULTS

In this study, we conduct a systematic and comparative benchmark analysis of 28 computational algorithms on 10 paired transcriptomic and proteomic datasets, evaluating their performance across various metrics in terms of clustering, peak memory, and running time. We also discuss the impact of highly variable genes (HVGs) and cell type granularity on clustering performance. Additionally, the robustness of these clustering methods on two kinds of omics is evaluating by using 30 simulated datasets. Furthermore, to explore the benefits of integrating omics information for clustering tasks, we integrate single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic data using 7 state-of-the-art integration methods and assess the performance of existing single-omics clustering schemes on the integrated features.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal modality-specific strengths and limitations, highlight the complementary nature of existing methods, and provide actionable insights to guide the selection of appropriate clustering approaches for specific scenarios. Overall, for top performance across two omics, consider scAIDE, scDCC, and FlowSOM, with FlowSOM also offering excellent robustness. For users prioritizing memory efficiency scDCC and scDeepCluster are recommended, while TSCAN, SHARP, and MarkovHC are recommended for users who prioritize time efficiency, and community detection-based methods offer a balance.

Для цитирования: Yin Yu-Hang, Wang Fang, Li Wei, Liu Qiaoming, Zhou Shengming, Zhou Murong, Jiang Zhongjun, Yu Dong-Jun, Wang Guohua. Comparative benchmarking of single-cell clustering algorithms for transcriptomic and proteomic data.. Genome biology. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-025-03719-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.