Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2025
Jump Squat Momentum: An Alternative Method to Prescribe Jump Squat Loads for Elite Rugby Union Players.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Loturco Irineu, Zabaloy Santiago, Bishop Chris, Mercer Valter P, Moura Tulio B M A, Ramos Mauricio S, Freitas Tomas T, Pereira Lucas A
Аннотация
Loturco, I, Zabaloy, S, Bishop, C, Mercer, VP, Moura, TBMA, Ramos, MS, Freitas, TT, and Pereira, LA. Jump squat momentum: An alternative method to prescribe jump squat loads for elite rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 39(7): 780-787, 2025-Rugby union is a team-sport in which collisions and impact forces play a decisive role. In this regard, momentum-based measurements (the product of mass and velocity of a body in a given movement) are frequently used by practitioners. Generally, sprint momentum (SM; the product of sprinting speed and athlete's body mass) is the most commonly considered momentum-based measure by coaches and sport scientists, either to differentiate playing positions or to examine player performance. However, recently, jump squat momentum (JSM) has been suggested as a complementary momentum-based measure because of its strong relationship with SM. In this study, we compared the body mass; half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM), in both absolute and relative terms (i.e., relative strength [RS]); sprinting speed and momentum; and JSM of 21 rugby backs and forwards using an independent t test. As expected, forwards are significantly heavier and stronger and exhibit higher SM and JSM than backs ( p ≤ 0.02). By contrast, backs are faster in linear sprints over both 10- and 30-m ( p < 0.001) and exhibit higher values of RS ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, irrespective of the playing position, RS was significantly different between the "low" and "high" RS groups ( p < 0.001). Despite these marked differences, all players achieved their greatest magnitudes of JSM at an average of 40% HS 1RM. Strength and conditioning coaches interested in increasing JSM and its related metrics (e.g., SM) in rugby players could use this specific loading range to prescribe JS loads during their strength-power training sessions.