PloS one · 2025
Position specific peak running demands, and influence of bout type in professional rugby union.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Glassbrook Daniel J, Williams Lewis D, McShane Kevin J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To quantify peak running intensity in professional rugby union across position groups, and peak running intensity differences between bout types (i.e., whole, starter, substitute).
DESIGN: Longitudinal study.
METHOD: Global positioning systems were used to assess the activity of 36 professional rugby union players. A moving average approach was used to identify the 1- to 10-minute peak intensity period distances, and time spent above 80% and 90% of individual 1-minute match peak. Differences between position groups and bout type were determined by magnitude-based inferences.
RESULTS: All position groups showed most likely moderate to most likely large differences in peak intensity periods, except for tight 5 vs. backrow (possibly trivial small and possibly small), and half-backs vs. outside backs (very likely trivial small to likely trivial small). No position group comparison for time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak resulted in moderate or greater differences. Possibly moderate to most likely moderate difference were observed between forwards whole vs. forward substitutes in 2- to 10-minute peak periods; most likely moderate differences were observed between forwards starters vs. forward substitutes in 10-minute peak intensity period; and most likely moderate differences were observed between backs whole vs. backs substitutes in the 1-minute peak intensity period. For time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak all bout type comparisons resulted in most likely moderate to most likely large differences.
CONCLUSIONS: There are meaningful differences between position groups in peak running intensity in professional rugby union, and substitute players perform lower peak intensity running than whole or starters.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study.
METHOD: Global positioning systems were used to assess the activity of 36 professional rugby union players. A moving average approach was used to identify the 1- to 10-minute peak intensity period distances, and time spent above 80% and 90% of individual 1-minute match peak. Differences between position groups and bout type were determined by magnitude-based inferences.
RESULTS: All position groups showed most likely moderate to most likely large differences in peak intensity periods, except for tight 5 vs. backrow (possibly trivial small and possibly small), and half-backs vs. outside backs (very likely trivial small to likely trivial small). No position group comparison for time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak resulted in moderate or greater differences. Possibly moderate to most likely moderate difference were observed between forwards whole vs. forward substitutes in 2- to 10-minute peak periods; most likely moderate differences were observed between forwards starters vs. forward substitutes in 10-minute peak intensity period; and most likely moderate differences were observed between backs whole vs. backs substitutes in the 1-minute peak intensity period. For time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak all bout type comparisons resulted in most likely moderate to most likely large differences.
CONCLUSIONS: There are meaningful differences between position groups in peak running intensity in professional rugby union, and substitute players perform lower peak intensity running than whole or starters.