Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2024
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of the University of Wisconsin running injury and recovery index to Brazilian Portuguese (UWRI-BR).
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Souza Thiago Melo Malheiros, Tessutti Vitor Daniel, Alvarenga Emilio, Benevides Filipe, Martinez Bruna Reclusa, Heiderscheit Bryan, Nelson Evan O, Yi Liu Chiao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery (UWRI) to Brazilian Portuguese (UWRI-BR) and assess its psychometric properties.
METHODS: The Brazilian version of the UWRI questionnaire was based on the guideline proposed by Guillemin. The UWRI was translated, back-translated, and culturally adapted. Fifty runners responded to the pre-final version to validate the final version. Ninety-seven runners participated in the content validity of the UWRI-BR, and 58 runners in the assessment of reliability baseline 48-72 h after the first response. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) version 2 (SF-12_2) were applied to construct validity.
RESULTS: The final version of UWRI-BR showed a positive moderate correlation with LEFS (r = 0.65, p < 0.01) and weak with SF-12_2 (r = 0.31, p < 0.01). UWRI-BR showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.92) and test-retest Reliability (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI (0,72-0,90).
CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the UWRI was a valid and reliable tool for evaluating and monitoring the progression of runners with running-related injuries.
METHODS: The Brazilian version of the UWRI questionnaire was based on the guideline proposed by Guillemin. The UWRI was translated, back-translated, and culturally adapted. Fifty runners responded to the pre-final version to validate the final version. Ninety-seven runners participated in the content validity of the UWRI-BR, and 58 runners in the assessment of reliability baseline 48-72 h after the first response. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) version 2 (SF-12_2) were applied to construct validity.
RESULTS: The final version of UWRI-BR showed a positive moderate correlation with LEFS (r = 0.65, p < 0.01) and weak with SF-12_2 (r = 0.31, p < 0.01). UWRI-BR showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.92) and test-retest Reliability (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI (0,72-0,90).
CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the UWRI was a valid and reliable tool for evaluating and monitoring the progression of runners with running-related injuries.